If your complaining about a console that you bought at launch, and didn't like, why are you complaining 3 years after it's launch?

And what other launches were you a gamer for? No console has ever launched with as many games as the 360 did.

The X360 had a good launch lineup:

Perfect Dark Zero
Call of Duty 2
Kameo
Condemned
+ Sports HD games (I still play Madden 06 to this day).

I dare you to find another console launch that had 4 good games. Did it have a bunch of junk like King Kong? Yes, but every system got that one. Condemned and Kameo were fantastic (Condemned ranks as one of the scariest games of all time), PD0 was serviceable, although not a step up from PD, and Call of Duty 2 was the best version outside of the PC version, since Tetryarch made the inferior PS2/XB versions.

I just wanted to give my OPINION on the best gaming-site on the net.

You say as many games? Ok, so quantity over quality?

I`m sure you haven`t played those games...because not only they represent quantity,they also represent quality.

I`m sorry that you just don`t get it,but again...it`s only your opinion.

 I`ve played Condemned and Kameo and Perfect Dark. Check metacritics. Thank you :)

You never bothered answering my question of finding another console that had 4 good games at launch. You didn't like PDZ. Great. Few did. That's why a lot of people really dug Kameo (still one of the best platformers the 360 has), Condemned (awesome survival/horror. One of the best cult games on the 360) and Call of Duty 2 (better than CoD3).

Furthermore, what systems had a great lineup immediately after launch? For the 360, we got:

• Dead or Alive 4
• Oblivion
• Ghost Recon: Advanced Warfighter

Within 6 months of launch. That is pretty impressive, IMO, of getting 3 great games to add on to the 4 very good ones. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but that doesn't make it a very good one. Which is why you aren't objectively looking at the 360's launch lineup. Again I ask: What system had a better initial lineup of games?

OWNED

Oh crap, I forgot Need For Speed: Most Wanted and Project Gotham Racing 3. Those were 2 very good games as well.

Mr. Game and Watch had Mr. Game and Watch A++++

Nes had mario. A++++

Snes had mario A++++

N64 had mario A+++++

Ps2 had (if I remeber correctly) ICO A+++++

Gamecube had (if I still remember correctly) Resident Evil 1 A++++++

Wii had Wii Sports A++++++

Xbox 360 had..... some b`s and c`s and d`s and e`s and even some f`s.

(This is a strategy to getting into the japanese gaming market where microsoft sell crappy (in the country where video-games has it`s origin).)

Do you really know where and when videogame was born?

mrstickball loaded his question pretty hard.  The consoles with the best launch titles typically have one or two amazing ones and a series of crap or 2/3 launch titles.  For example, the NES' launch with just The Legend of Zelda and Mario Bros. brutally crushes the 360's in terms of quality, but all it had to compliment those was a bunch of sports games which may have been good for the time but.... ymmv.

Overall, I think the SNES is probably the console to beat for launch lineups.  Its launch titles included Super Mario World, Super Pilot Wings, F-Zero, and Super R-Type (though Super R-Type was slightly delayed for the US).  Compared to the SNES, the 360 is stunningly mediocre.  Even the PS2's launch line-up (which is easily more diverse than the 360's IMO) can't top the SNES'.