By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - Real Life or Crysis?

Hurfdurf said:
The third picture is a real picture, the first two are Crysis. This isn't a guess. The filenames for the first two indicate crysis, and the last one is not.

All 3 are Crysis.  You saw the file names so you should have seen that.   The 3rd file simply comes from a different source than the first two but all 3 are in game.

 



The rEVOLution is not being televised

Around the Network
Cheeseburger said:
FastFord58 said:
Cheeseburger said:

So two weeks ago I bought a brand new computer... Core I7 processor, Nividia 295GTX graphics card, 4gb of memory.  So I can play Crysis maxed out.  First let me start by saying Crysis does look amazing.  However, these pics I always see are very misleading.  When playing the game at a high resolution you can easily tell its a game and while it can sometimes come semi close, there is never a point where you would literally question if you were looking at a game or real life.  Yet these rl/crysis comparison pics are always low res or pixelated and even after playing the game I can hardly tell the real pictures from the crysis ones.  So the bottom line is, Crysis is amazing, but the game does not look like real life nearly to the degree that all these comparison pictures suggest.

One other note, and I probably shouldn't do this but now that I got to play Crysis on max settings and the Killzone 2 demo I just wanted to make a quick comparison.  Crysis has better textures, more environment detail and much more realistic environments.  On the otherhand Killzone 2 seems to have much better character models, gun models, and animations.  Basically, there are aspects of Crysis that are out of Kilzone 2's league, but there may be an equal number of aspects of killzone 2 that are out of crysis' league.  IMO

 

I will disagree but not completely. Character models and model textures in Crysis obliterate KZ2s, sorry. You can tell that just by looking at hands, let alone everything else. Same with the gun models.

 

The pre-physics animation, I will agree with you on that. KZ2s animations are better than Crysis.

Well first let me say that the hands of your own character isn't a good judge of comparing character models, they are usually much more detailed than the other characters in the game since they are on screen much more.  But take out the knife in Killzone 2... I thought even your own character's hands were better in Killzone.  And I felt that other character models were better in killzone 2, and the character models in Crysis were probably the games weakest point, if you can even call it weak.  Just zoom in on a dead enemy in crysis and compare it to killzone 2, to me killzone looked much better in this category. Also for gun models, I really didn't even think it was close, killzone seemed in another league, they really went into incredible detail for the gun models.  But once again Killzone 2 doesnt touch crysis in environment detail, or most textures.

 

Go through the Aircrft carrier level again. Go right up to dudes and look at the faces and the texturing and everything. Especially the Admiral during the bridge cutscene. It's just better.

 



"Man is born free but is everywhere in chains" - Rousseau