every 360 game not on PS3 helps disprove the theory that PS3 has a better 09 lineup.
every 360 game not on PS3 helps disprove the theory that PS3 has a better 09 lineup.
axumblade said:
lol. I'm not sure if that's a compliment or a warning on my sarcasm levels. |
Err...his sarcasm is wrong though. Southpeak is the publisher and they publish all sorts of crap.
Developer is Timegate and while their record isn't stellar, its not bad either.
http://www.timegate.com/games.php
I like FPS games so I will keep an eye on this one. If it rips off halo well enough its worth buying...
meh. never heard of it we still have killzone 2
So a PC shooter with a 360 port... no lose for the PS3 honestly.


| ssj12 said: So a PC shooter with a 360 port... no lose for the PS3 honestly. |
+10000!
PC shooters are crap!
Other than a few exemptions(such as The Orange Box), PC games are the reason why the 360 has so many subpar console exclusives... like Two Worlds!
I'm glad you'r finally seing the true light about PC games SSJ12!
Proud Member of GAIBoWS (Gamers Against Irrational Bans of Weezy & Squilliam)

gebx said:
+10000! PC shooters are crap! Other than a few exemptions(such as The Orange Box), PC games are the reason why the 360 has so many subpar console exclusives... like Two Worlds! I'm glad you'r finally seing the true light about PC games SSJ12! |
errr....
I hope you know that I know for a fact there are thousands of PC Shooters that own everything on consoles for example the FREE FPS WarSaw.


Ports are a fairly static cost. If the games budget, and potential, don't hit a certain mark, making a port just isn't worth it.
Any 3rd party PC/360 game which isn't getting a PS3 port wasn't deemed substantial enough to warrant one, so its not that big of an issue, really, unless you bought games like Dark Sector, Jericho, The Darkness, etc. and really enjoyed them.