I really wouldnt say 'xbot fan' to be honest with you....

Good hearing that from them.

I just saw that stuff in the comments and it's weird. 

Seeing "xbot" in a post on vgChartz makes me feel like I'm back in 2006/2007.

Interesting to see how far vgChartz has come as a community since then.

The game has good graphics great. What else is so special about it? Since I keep hearing of the junk.

I've seen more "KZ2 is better graphically than Crysis" than I've seem "GeoW2 is better graphically than KZ2"

I'm just making an observation. personally I think both statements are false, but that's just me.

I personally agree. I no longer have belief that pictures on-line do justice.  I think it was gamespot who use to compare pictures of video systems.  Some of them I believed it did not properly displayed them right.  Its getting to the point this is why nintendo won.  Fun games that take up hours amounts of people's time.

It makes a change to see some honesty.

Clearly the entire United Kingdom is biased...

If you scroll all the way down on that website and read the comments they said is not from the Xbox 360 magazine instead the magazine is called 360 and is not related to the XBOX at all.

Awww damn! I knew something was fishy. :(

Still, I've said it and I'll say it again: Textures > Any other effect in a game.