By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Would it bother you if the PS3 was Sony's last console?

YEah it would bother me very much, but wouldn't care after a few days.



Around the Network

The most reliable consoles are Nintendo ones. I've never heard of any problems with their consoles except for when you need to push the cartridge in a little harder due to the age of the machine.

I remember my Saturn and especially the Dreamcast giving me hardware problems. The PS2 was notorious for it's disc read error.



I think that would kind of suck, you know not having a new system and all.

Sounds scary



Ain't no rules in the jungle, if there were I wouldn't be here!!

Pristine20 said:
OMG Ronster316 has infected this thread. It was a matter of time.

 

Its a sony thread with potentially bad news for sony, i was bound to turn up lol.

Just like the sony fanboys do when theres an RROD thread or 360 exclusives of 09 thread.



apparently this thread is now about who has the longest ...quotation



Around the Network

Yes i would care. Many people seem to forget that the people in the gaming division are just that.....People! Many would lose there jobs and that makes economy as a whole even weaker. Many view it as a sinking ship however, look at the wii (while i hate the idea of it) nintendo was last for 2 seasons then did a major come back.
Now apart from all those poor people losing there jobs, personally imo I beleive that the PS3 has the highest qaulity console this year. Aside from price tag and being a year late, it's a shame to see such a good product be tossed aside. I would like to see what's next as every year they do so much better at giving me exactly what I'm looking for. Don't get me wrong i have dipped and dabbled with microsoft, but for 2 generations now I have preferred a Sony console.



CURRENTLY PLAYING:  Warframe, Witcher 2

I'd be very worried.
Just like without MS competition Sony could become a danger, so MS could without Sony. Nintendo hasn't many divisions as MS and Sony, so it must earn from HW and SW, left alone against MS it could be damaged by MS blows under the belt like selling HW with heavily loss leader price and heavy moneyhatting.
Three strong competitors is the magic recipe for consumers' interest.



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW! 
 


Cactus said:
Snake said:
Ronster316 said:
Torillian said:
Ronster316 said:
Torillian said:
Ronster316 said:
bouzane said:
Ronster316 said:
disolitude said:
Not at all. Sony came in to the business by hogging 3rd party games with cash...putting Sega(much superior gaming company) out of hardware and almost crippling Nintendos console business.

If they left someone else would jsut take their spot and pick up their studios...

 

100% true

I second the above statement.

(Saved me from going in to an anti sony rant lol)

Conviniently forget to mention that the Saturn's contrived hardware architecture and Nintendo's poor treatment of third party developers is what allowed Sony to enter the market and dominate. Take off the rose tinted glasses and recognize that Sega and Nintendo did these things to themselves.

 

 

Sonys MONEY did more damage the Sega and Nintendo than Sega and Nintendo did to themselves.

They preyed on REAL GAMES DEVELOPERS and fed them to the wolves.

Bottom line______________________

 

And how exactly have you proven this theory?  Y'know, other than just believing what you want to believe.

OT: it would bother me because I like Playstation, not particularly Sony.  If some other company came in and took over the playstation brand then I'd be fine with it on face value, barring whatever changes they decide to put forth that may or may not annoy me.

oh forget it, yes, it was Sonys amazing gaming division of 1994-1999 that made all the difference right?

Oh wait? they had no damn games in 1994 and relied on 3rd party support to get them to the top and not their own gaming division talent.

How is it a proven theory? so you think the Saturn and N64 would have been failures if sony wasn't around? Lots of 3rd party developers took Sonys easy money rather than supporting two Hardware and software legends.

So why do i blame sony and not developers? simple, sony were the ones with the cheque book.

But both Nintendo and Sega also did things to make their own consoles failures without the inclusion of Sony.  So yes they would've succeeded if there were no other competition, but I'm not so certain that they would've succeeded if they had competition that didn't throw around money like Sony did, because they still would've had their own situations working against them.

And since you have shown me nothing proving how Sony's monetary actions were the most meaningful to the downfall of N64 and Saturn, and I know you're very much biased against Sony and would like to blame them for all the troubles in the world, I have no reason to believe you.

 

You have your beliefs and i have mine.

Big money "corporations" FTW huh?

Buying your way to the top FTW huh?

If sony go under its nothing more than they deserve IMO.

 

 

 How is SONY's fault they have a lot of money to spend on PlayStation? They have a lot of money so they are using it to make PlayStation brand better.They have a right to do that.There is nothing illegal about company trying to make their product good. Maybe SEGA should tried to spend more money on 3rd party developers than on 1st party developers.

I don't mean to intrude in this conversation, but isn't this the same reason why so many people dislike Microsoft? Using money to force their way into the gaming industry and gain an advantage over their competitors makes Microsoft an "evil corporation"...yet it's OK for Sony?

Seems a bit hypocritical to me.

 

i dont hate microsoft because they are using money to force their way to gaming industry. why would you hate the company because of that? when you are load of money spend it.

 



it's more possible that we will see Sony shuting down every other division than SCE.In long term PlayStation is the most profitable part of Sony.



Yes, because in that situation great but unfortunately not that profitable prestige dev teams like Team ICO could be axed and budgets for projects could take a huge dive, which certainly could negatively influence production values and in the end enjoyment of the titles.