Quality/Hype. So a low quality game with zero hype is near 1 the same for a high quality game with too much hype, bad games are those with low quality/too much hype, they are near 0.

Having this in mind: for you what is the worst game in history?

I can't think in one that I have played right now, but this gen we have seen a lot.

I will say E.T. for the Atari.

Well, the quality/hype ratio makes Lair come to mind...

But I only mention that because the instant I read this thread my brain went "Quick! Only 9 replies, be the first to say ET for Atari!" but no, you covered it in the OP. So you've basically ended the thread, because ET is the be-all end-all of terrible games. When I first played it, I was too young to realize I wasn't doing anything wrong. Eventually you fall in the pit and can't get out. It wasn't fair... I tried so hard... so hard... but I could never win...

Well, the quality/hype ratio makes lair come to mind...

But I only mention that because the instant I read this thread my brain went "Quick! Only 9 replies, be the first to say ET for Atari!" but no, you covered it in the OP. So you've basically ended the thread, because ET is the be-all end-all of terrible games. When I first played it, I was too young to realize I wasn't doing anything wrong. Eventually you fall in the pit and can't get out. It wasn't fair... I tried so hard... so hard... but I could never win...

Well, the quality/hype ratio makes lair come to mind...

But I only mention that because the instant I read this thread my brain went "Quick! Only 9 replies, be the first to say ET for Atari!" but no, you covered it in the OP. So you've basically ended the thread, because ET is the be-all end-all of terrible games. When I first played it, I was too young to realize I wasn't doing anything wrong. Eventually you fall in the pit and can't get out. It wasn't fair... I tried so hard... so hard... but I could never win...