By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Star Ocean 4...atomic bomb?

Fishie on 29 December 2008
Jo21 said:
flagship said:
Phrancheyez said:


If Star Ocean hadn't become so popular on SONY platforms, it wouldn't even be worth money hatting.  

 Yes, let's make another silly thread about MS "stealing" all the RPGs Sony "stole" from Nintendo....

 

 

 

 

 

nintendo kicked them out. sometimes its nice to know about video game story.

it was 64mb (read small space) and nintendo snes third party affairs that made all the third party go to the more profitable ps1.

cheaper to produce Cds, with more memory.

 

 Yeah that office building Sony gave Square had nothing to do with it, the fact that Square was first considering the Saturn as a platform once they noticed they could get a sweet deal had nothing to do with it either, nor the fact that Nintendo allowed Square to work with their hottest property(Mario) in order to convince them not to go was totally unrelated too.

 

Ignorance breeds posts like the one you just made.



Around the Network
Strategyking92 on 29 December 2008

no, they are missing most of their fans.. on the wii. Remember that playstation is only a couple million higher than the 360 is japan.. and overall, the xbox is about 10 million higher than the ps3.
And the wii has already got a well known tales series.

Who knows though, we will see how it'll do later.



And that's the only thing I need is *this*. I don't need this or this. Just this PS4... And this gaming PC. - The PS4 and the Gaming PC and that's all I need... And this Xbox 360. - The PS4, the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360, and that's all I need... And these PS3's. - The PS4, and these PS3's, and the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360... And this Nintendo DS. - The PS4, this Xbox 360, and the Gaming PC, and the PS3's, and that's all *I* need. And that's *all* I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one... I need this. - The Gaming PC and PS4, and Xbox 360, and thePS3's . Well what are you looking at? What do you think I'm some kind of a jerk or something! - And this. That's all I need.

Obligatory dick measuring Gaming Laptop Specs: Sager NP8270-GTX: 17.3" FULL HD (1920X1080) LED Matte LC, nVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3, 750GB SATA II 3GB/s 7,200 RPM Hard Drive

markers on 29 December 2008
Fishie said:
Jo21 said:
flagship said:
Phrancheyez said:


If Star Ocean hadn't become so popular on SONY platforms, it wouldn't even be worth money hatting.  

 Yes, let's make another silly thread about MS "stealing" all the RPGs Sony "stole" from Nintendo....

 

 

 

 

 

nintendo kicked them out. sometimes its nice to know about video game story.

it was 64mb (read small space) and nintendo snes third party affairs that made all the third party go to the more profitable ps1.

cheaper to produce Cds, with more memory.

 

 Yeah that office building Sony gave Square had nothing to do with it, the fact that Square was first considering the Saturn as a platform once they noticed they could get a sweet deal had nothing to do with it either, nor the fact that Nintendo allowed Square to work with their hottest property(Mario) in order to convince them not to go was totally unrelated too.

 

Ignorance breeds posts like the one you just made.

 

sony knew had to play ball back then



Deviation59 on 29 December 2008
Fishie said:
Jo21 said:
flagship said:
Phrancheyez said:


If Star Ocean hadn't become so popular on SONY platforms, it wouldn't even be worth money hatting.  

 Yes, let's make another silly thread about MS "stealing" all the RPGs Sony "stole" from Nintendo....

 

 

 

 

 

nintendo kicked them out. sometimes its nice to know about video game story.

it was 64mb (read small space) and nintendo snes third party affairs that made all the third party go to the more profitable ps1.

cheaper to produce Cds, with more memory.

 

 Yeah that office building Sony gave Square had nothing to do with it, the fact that Square was first considering the Saturn as a platform once they noticed they could get a sweet deal had nothing to do with it either, nor the fact that Nintendo allowed Square to work with their hottest property(Mario) in order to convince them not to go was totally unrelated too.

 

Ignorance breeds posts like the one you just made.

Point is, Sony didn't steal shit from Nintendo. Nintendo shot themselves repeatedly in the feet back then. Kinda like Sony has done for the past couple of years.

 



Jo21 on 29 December 2008
Deviation59 said:
Fishie said:
Jo21 said:
flagship said:
Phrancheyez said:


If Star Ocean hadn't become so popular on SONY platforms, it wouldn't even be worth money hatting.  

 Yes, let's make another silly thread about MS "stealing" all the RPGs Sony "stole" from Nintendo....

 

 

 

 

 

nintendo kicked them out. sometimes its nice to know about video game story.

it was 64mb (read small space) and nintendo snes third party affairs that made all the third party go to the more profitable ps1.

cheaper to produce Cds, with more memory.

 

 Yeah that office building Sony gave Square had nothing to do with it, the fact that Square was first considering the Saturn as a platform once they noticed they could get a sweet deal had nothing to do with it either, nor the fact that Nintendo allowed Square to work with their hottest property(Mario) in order to convince them not to go was totally unrelated too.

 

Ignorance breeds posts like the one you just made.

Point is, Sony didn't steal shit from Nintendo. Nintendo shot themselves repeatedly in the feet back then. Kinda like Sony has done for the past couple of years.

 

 

/point



Around the Network
Seraphic_Sixaxis on 29 December 2008

Oh HELL NO!!! You are NOT calling the one game i'd jump in for a gigabomb are you?

Blasphemy...



Fishie on 29 December 2008
Deviation59 said:
Fishie said:
Jo21 said:
flagship said:
Phrancheyez said:


If Star Ocean hadn't become so popular on SONY platforms, it wouldn't even be worth money hatting.  

 Yes, let's make another silly thread about MS "stealing" all the RPGs Sony "stole" from Nintendo....

 

 

 

 

 

nintendo kicked them out. sometimes its nice to know about video game story.

it was 64mb (read small space) and nintendo snes third party affairs that made all the third party go to the more profitable ps1.

cheaper to produce Cds, with more memory.

 

 Yeah that office building Sony gave Square had nothing to do with it, the fact that Square was first considering the Saturn as a platform once they noticed they could get a sweet deal had nothing to do with it either, nor the fact that Nintendo allowed Square to work with their hottest property(Mario) in order to convince them not to go was totally unrelated too.

 

Ignorance breeds posts like the one you just made.

Point is, Sony didn't steal shit from Nintendo. Nintendo shot themselves repeatedly in the feet back then. Kinda like Sony has done for the past couple of years.

 

Nope, Sony invented the moneyhat for Square/FFVII back then.

 



Jo21 on 29 December 2008
Fishie said:
Deviation59 said:
Fishie said:
Jo21 said:
flagship said:
Phrancheyez said:


If Star Ocean hadn't become so popular on SONY platforms, it wouldn't even be worth money hatting.  

 Yes, let's make another silly thread about MS "stealing" all the RPGs Sony "stole" from Nintendo....

 

 

 

 

 

nintendo kicked them out. sometimes its nice to know about video game story.

it was 64mb (read small space) and nintendo snes third party affairs that made all the third party go to the more profitable ps1.

cheaper to produce Cds, with more memory.

 

 Yeah that office building Sony gave Square had nothing to do with it, the fact that Square was first considering the Saturn as a platform once they noticed they could get a sweet deal had nothing to do with it either, nor the fact that Nintendo allowed Square to work with their hottest property(Mario) in order to convince them not to go was totally unrelated too.

 

Ignorance breeds posts like the one you just made.

Point is, Sony didn't steal shit from Nintendo. Nintendo shot themselves repeatedly in the feet back then. Kinda like Sony has done for the past couple of years.

 

Nope, Sony invented the moneyhat for Square/FFVII back then.

 

 

keep believing that but everybody know 700mb disc and higher profits was a easy lure.



Deviation59 on 29 December 2008
Fishie said:
Deviation59 said:
Fishie said:
Jo21 said:
flagship said:
Phrancheyez said:


If Star Ocean hadn't become so popular on SONY platforms, it wouldn't even be worth money hatting.  

 Yes, let's make another silly thread about MS "stealing" all the RPGs Sony "stole" from Nintendo....

 

 

 

 

 

nintendo kicked them out. sometimes its nice to know about video game story.

it was 64mb (read small space) and nintendo snes third party affairs that made all the third party go to the more profitable ps1.

cheaper to produce Cds, with more memory.

 

 Yeah that office building Sony gave Square had nothing to do with it, the fact that Square was first considering the Saturn as a platform once they noticed they could get a sweet deal had nothing to do with it either, nor the fact that Nintendo allowed Square to work with their hottest property(Mario) in order to convince them not to go was totally unrelated too.

 

Ignorance breeds posts like the one you just made.

Point is, Sony didn't steal shit from Nintendo. Nintendo shot themselves repeatedly in the feet back then. Kinda like Sony has done for the past couple of years.

 

Nope, Sony invented the moneyhat for Square/FFVII back then.

 

 

CD-ROM vs. cartridge. The cartridge format did not allow Squaresoft to make the kind of game that they wanted to make. Period.

You can make up whatever other story you want but that's what it came down to in the end.



Seraphic_Sixaxis on 29 December 2008
Deviation59 said:
Fishie said:
Deviation59 said:
Fishie said:
Jo21 said:
flagship said:
Phrancheyez said:


If Star Ocean hadn't become so popular on SONY platforms, it wouldn't even be worth money hatting.  

 Yes, let's make another silly thread about MS "stealing" all the RPGs Sony "stole" from Nintendo....

 

 

 

 

 

nintendo kicked them out. sometimes its nice to know about video game story.

it was 64mb (read small space) and nintendo snes third party affairs that made all the third party go to the more profitable ps1.

cheaper to produce Cds, with more memory.

 

 Yeah that office building Sony gave Square had nothing to do with it, the fact that Square was first considering the Saturn as a platform once they noticed they could get a sweet deal had nothing to do with it either, nor the fact that Nintendo allowed Square to work with their hottest property(Mario) in order to convince them not to go was totally unrelated too.

 

Ignorance breeds posts like the one you just made.

Point is, Sony didn't steal shit from Nintendo. Nintendo shot themselves repeatedly in the feet back then. Kinda like Sony has done for the past couple of years.

 

Nope, Sony invented the moneyhat for Square/FFVII back then.

 

 

CD-ROM vs. cartridge. The cartridge format did not allow Squaresoft to make the kind of game that they wanted to make. Period.

You can make up whatever other story you want but that's what it came down to in the end.

I'd have to agree with you on this one.