| stof said: You do realize that those songs would never even get played on the radio if it wasn't for the legions of slutty music loving 12 year old girls, right? It's hard to protect an age group from something when that age group is the very reason it exists. |
So because the Radio and Record industry encourage promiscuous behavior in pre-teens it makes it OK for EA to? Look, I could go on and on about this, but it wouldn't matter. Just go read the news stories about kids hitting puberty earlier for a start. And there's plenty more after that.
@Bodhesatva: I agree that ESRB ratings are worthless. It should be parents' jobs to screen what they get for their kids.
But as for sex vs. violence, I view that one as fairly simple, although I'm sure some, if not many, will disagree. I doubt there's more than a few on these boards that thinks violence in music, movies, and videogames increases violence in real life. However, can the same be said for sex? I think not. The pre-teens see and hear promiscuous behavior being glorified everywhere. And they have practically no one telling them otherwise, especially if their parents are not involved, as is the case often these days.
This argument will mean nothing to a person who thinks promiscuous behavior is OK. I, however, believe it is extremely detrimental emotionally, and physically too, if STDs become involved.