By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Nintendo Hatred is Getting Disrespectful

N.Genckel said:
Solid_Raiden said:
N.Genckel said:
Solid_Raiden said:
Zucas said:
N.Genckel said:
The problem is that people have forgot what an opinion is. To have an opinion, you have to know about the thing you have an opinion about. These days, it's like people think they can have an opinion about something they know absolutly nothing about and have 0 experience with. That's called being ignorant, and that's when you don't actually have an opinion, but just spew uneducated, useless crap.

 

Yes I've always believed in the idea of everyone can say their opinion but there are always better ones than others.  That's what I call justice haha.  The recognition of what's right and it works for opinions as well.

 

 But this idea that the two of you shar is just another opinion. And that's the messed up thing about opinions. lol There is no defined definition of the boundries or limitations of what a person's opinion might be. You might have an opinion of what an opinion defines, but then my opinion might be different. :P

Yes, there is. If yor opinion is uneducated, it's worthless. With no value. Of no use. It's not hard to understand, and it's not an opinion. You are exactly one of those people that I talked about. Someone who don't know what an opinion actually is.

 

 

 First off, I never said that was my opinion. I believe the opinion of someone with no knowledge of a given subject is worthless. However, I unlike you realise that this too is just my opinion and by no means cancels out the opinion of others. Others may disagree and believe that the opinion of all people are of equal worth, and that is their opinion. So get off your high horse and down here with the rest of us.

But congradulations, my OPINION of you is that your hardly of the knowledge for me to take any opinion of yours seriously if you can't even understand that. 

 

 What was your opinion? You said what you said as a definition, that wasn't an opinion. What I'm saying isn't an opinion either, it's a fact. Somewhere, it was forgotten that an opinion has to build on education, and now some people define an opinion as something that can range from extremely educated to completely clueless. Now people like you think it's ok to have an opinion about something you have no clue about. That's not optimal. Actually, it's pretty dangerous in a democracy.

And thanks for the uber prententious attempt at a knock at the end. Tells people alot about you.

Main Entry: opin·ion  Pronunciation: \ə-ˈpin-yən\ Function: noun Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin opinion-, opinio, from opinari Date: 14th century
1 a: a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a particular matter b: approval , esteem2 a: belief stronger than impression and less strong than positive knowledge b: a generally held view3 a: a formal expression of judgment or advice by an expert b: the formal expression (as by a judge, court, or referee) of the legal reasons and principles upon which a legal decision is based
opin·ioned -yənd\ adjective
Nowhere in the definition of an Opinion does it state someone has to be educated in a matter to have an opinion about something. I can have no idea what a subject is about and yet have an opinion on it. Your the one passing your opinion as fact. Now, even though I know someone can have an opinion on something with no knowledge of that subject I believe, personally, that those opinions are of no worth. But perhaps this is too difficult for you to understand?

 




PS3 Trophies

 

 

Around the Network

I hate Nintendo more than anything else in gaming, so what?

I don't have to respect, and i sure as hell don't have to like them. If there's a problem, get over it. Someone doesn't like what you like... That's life.



Zucas said:
Solid_Raiden said:
Zucas said:
SmokedHostage said:
It remember it being said that(paraphazing) "One of the biggest strengths of Democracy is that everyone has a say. And one of the biggest weaknesses of Democracy is that everyone has a say." I don't know why.. but this thread made me think about that.

 

Oh absolutely. Democracies have no concern for what's right. They never have. They are concerned with equality and freedome which are great but justice has to be present. Sometimes it jsut isn't because supporting the majority cancels this out a lot of the time. Ethics is probably the real problem. Starts with the family and if parents don't teach their children right and wrong then it carries through life.

I think another quote about democracy is, "A democracy's largest danger is public opinion." Conformity of the masses is always a bad thing which is usually apparent in democracies especially in America. But don't get me started on politics haha. I'll never stop talking.

Even Democracies must give up freedoms to achieve order though. In fact when we vote for our president we are voting for the very freedoms we are willing to give up in order to achieve that order. We do this by investigating the policies of the candidates and what we lose vs. what we gain. For instance, by looking at the political parties as a whole, Democrats would rather give up some freedoms for the pursuit of equality while Republicans would have us give up some freedoms for order and protection.

To be free is to live without laws, therefore we limit our freedoms by inacting laws to protect us.

 

 

Yes even democracies couldn't avoide the teachings of Hobbes.  Absolute freedom is impossible in a world of chaos.  However, I personally believe chaos can be destroyed by virtue ethics.  It's the law set up by that of Aristotle who's basic principle is that ethical people will make ethical decisions.  From birth ethics and justice should be the prime subjects of learning along with normal education.  Teach them about the "good" as Aristotle would put it and they will be ethical people.  Ethical people can live with absolute freedom devoid of a set of laws because they will do the right thing.  Sure they would have the freedom to kill someone and their would be no repercussions but if they know this is unethical they won't do it. 

Maybe that's just the idealist in me or maybe its a possibility.  Who knows.

That concept looks really good on paper but I believe has little worth in practice. For instance, we all go to church (at least most of us) and are raised in believing some things are evil and bad since birth and yet we still do it. We are preached that smoking is bad, drugs are bad, premarital sex is bad, but it only makes us want to do those things more. Why? Because the human being is a vile creature that seeks destruction. I believe every kid at many different times have done the exact opposite of what they were raised and preached into doing.

 




PS3 Trophies

 

 

sega4life said:

here.... just replace Britney with Nintendo and you have the OP in Video Form

LEAVE NINTENDO ALONE.......

lmfao

Haha in a way I guess I'm just a more educated him with a lot better reasoning and justice on my side.  And well a lot of other things as well.  Hmm I guess in some weird way my well thought out reason for my complaint is a lot like his bitching but only in your world apparently.  Thx for the heads up though.  Dude's hair in that video is awesome.

 



Solid_Raiden said:
Zucas said:
Solid_Raiden said:
Zucas said:
SmokedHostage said:
It remember it being said that(paraphazing) "One of the biggest strengths of Democracy is that everyone has a say. And one of the biggest weaknesses of Democracy is that everyone has a say." I don't know why.. but this thread made me think about that.

 

Oh absolutely. Democracies have no concern for what's right. They never have. They are concerned with equality and freedome which are great but justice has to be present. Sometimes it jsut isn't because supporting the majority cancels this out a lot of the time. Ethics is probably the real problem. Starts with the family and if parents don't teach their children right and wrong then it carries through life.

I think another quote about democracy is, "A democracy's largest danger is public opinion." Conformity of the masses is always a bad thing which is usually apparent in democracies especially in America. But don't get me started on politics haha. I'll never stop talking.

Even Democracies must give up freedoms to achieve order though. In fact when we vote for our president we are voting for the very freedoms we are willing to give up in order to achieve that order. We do this by investigating the policies of the candidates and what we lose vs. what we gain. For instance, by looking at the political parties as a whole, Democrats would rather give up some freedoms for the pursuit of equality while Republicans would have us give up some freedoms for order and protection.

To be free is to live without laws, therefore we limit our freedoms by inacting laws to protect us.

 

 

Yes even democracies couldn't avoide the teachings of Hobbes. Absolute freedom is impossible in a world of chaos. However, I personally believe chaos can be destroyed by virtue ethics. It's the law set up by that of Aristotle who's basic principle is that ethical people will make ethical decisions. From birth ethics and justice should be the prime subjects of learning along with normal education. Teach them about the "good" as Aristotle would put it and they will be ethical people. Ethical people can live with absolute freedom devoid of a set of laws because they will do the right thing. Sure they would have the freedom to kill someone and their would be no repercussions but if they know this is unethical they won't do it.

Maybe that's just the idealist in me or maybe its a possibility. Who knows.

That concept looks really good on paper but I believe has little worth in practice. For instance, we all go to church (at least most of us) and are raised in believing some things are evil and bad since birth and yet we still do it. We are preached that smoking is bad, drugs are bad, premarital sex is bad, but it only makes us want to do those things more. Why? Because the human being is a vile creature that seeks destruction. I believe every kid at many different times have done the exact opposite of what they were raised and preached into doing.

 

Well of course it looks good on paper.  I guess that's what an idealist is about haha.  But for this to work, everyone has to be on the same page.  If one falters, then everyone falters.  I mean life is a set of choices and you have to know what choices are right.  This is something that's taught and not everyone is taught it.  I believe if everyone was, then it'd work.  Of course this is unrealistic because it'll never happen as someone will always break the  mold.  It's jsut the idea of everyone doing and knowing what's right will leave to ethical decisions.  Which it is becaue it's all they ever knew.

Of course this does go back to wheter you think humans are born greed, corrupt, and vile or do you think its taught.  I agree with Aristotle that its taught but you seem to agree with Hobbes that it's inherited.  Who knows what it is haha.

 



Around the Network

I don't agree with this thread.
The Sony hatred is getting disrespectful.



Zucas said:
Solid_Raiden said:
Zucas said:
Solid_Raiden said:
Zucas said:
SmokedHostage said:
It remember it being said that(paraphazing) "One of the biggest strengths of Democracy is that everyone has a say. And one of the biggest weaknesses of Democracy is that everyone has a say." I don't know why.. but this thread made me think about that.

 

Oh absolutely. Democracies have no concern for what's right. They never have. They are concerned with equality and freedome which are great but justice has to be present. Sometimes it jsut isn't because supporting the majority cancels this out a lot of the time. Ethics is probably the real problem. Starts with the family and if parents don't teach their children right and wrong then it carries through life.

I think another quote about democracy is, "A democracy's largest danger is public opinion." Conformity of the masses is always a bad thing which is usually apparent in democracies especially in America. But don't get me started on politics haha. I'll never stop talking.

Even Democracies must give up freedoms to achieve order though. In fact when we vote for our president we are voting for the very freedoms we are willing to give up in order to achieve that order. We do this by investigating the policies of the candidates and what we lose vs. what we gain. For instance, by looking at the political parties as a whole, Democrats would rather give up some freedoms for the pursuit of equality while Republicans would have us give up some freedoms for order and protection.

To be free is to live without laws, therefore we limit our freedoms by inacting laws to protect us.

 

 

Yes even democracies couldn't avoide the teachings of Hobbes. Absolute freedom is impossible in a world of chaos. However, I personally believe chaos can be destroyed by virtue ethics. It's the law set up by that of Aristotle who's basic principle is that ethical people will make ethical decisions. From birth ethics and justice should be the prime subjects of learning along with normal education. Teach them about the "good" as Aristotle would put it and they will be ethical people. Ethical people can live with absolute freedom devoid of a set of laws because they will do the right thing. Sure they would have the freedom to kill someone and their would be no repercussions but if they know this is unethical they won't do it.

Maybe that's just the idealist in me or maybe its a possibility. Who knows.

That concept looks really good on paper but I believe has little worth in practice. For instance, we all go to church (at least most of us) and are raised in believing some things are evil and bad since birth and yet we still do it. We are preached that smoking is bad, drugs are bad, premarital sex is bad, but it only makes us want to do those things more. Why? Because the human being is a vile creature that seeks destruction. I believe every kid at many different times have done the exact opposite of what they were raised and preached into doing.

 

Well of course it looks good on paper.  I guess that's what an idealist is about haha.  But for this to work, everyone has to be on the same page.  If one falters, then everyone falters.  I mean life is a set of choices and you have to know what choices are right.  This is something that's taught and not everyone is taught it.  I believe if everyone was, then it'd work.  Of course this is unrealistic because it'll never happen as someone will always break the  mold.  It's jsut the idea of everyone doing and knowing what's right will leave to ethical decisions.  Which it is becaue it's all they ever knew.

Of course this does go back to wheter you think humans are born greed, corrupt, and vile or do you think its taught.  I agree with Aristotle that its taught but you seem to agree with Hobbes that it's inherited.  Who knows what it is haha.

 

In psychology we had to write a paper on what method we agreed with (I forget the names) wether human are born evil, born good, or born with a blank slate and must be taught right and wrong. I wrote on the last of those. I personally want to believe we are all born good but I can't overlook the fact that children must be taught what not to do, not what to do. So I settled for in the middle. lol

I want to have hope in human beings, but sometimes its hard to. We are so destructive and evil in nature it seems. But I hold out hope.

 




PS3 Trophies

 

 

Smashed said:
I don't agree with this thread.
The Sony hatred is getting disrespectful.

 

I don't agree with this post



Solid- yea I'd probably go along with the clean slate thing but its hard to deny genetics. I mean if you can inherit physical traits then you its possible you can inherit personality traits.

yea the nature vs. nurture argument is very intriguing and I'd love to discuss it in detail with you sometime. But it's 2 in the morning so I must be going. Later everyone.



11ht11 said:
Smashed said:
I don't agree with this thread.
The Sony hatred is getting disrespectful.

 

I don't agree with this post

 

Cmon.. You have to be blind to not see all the Sony hatred recently.. But I will drop it because, this is a nintendo thread.