twesterm said: People are upset because they don't have the best* *Assuming you categorize the best as best in sales |
If that's the case, they should buy the best*. Then they needn't be upset anymore.
twesterm said: People are upset because they don't have the best* *Assuming you categorize the best as best in sales |
If that's the case, they should buy the best*. Then they needn't be upset anymore.
Because last is always an emarassing place to be in?
it doesn't really bother me to much it's just the fact that the greatest console gaming empire the past 10 or so years doesn't deserve to be in last
it's also getting the short end of the stick on certain 3rd party games as developers don't think it's worth the time to do a better job
it is also in 3rd currently do to MS playing real dirty by taking almost all of sony's 3rd party exclusives that made ps12 what they were and that just ain't right
Play Me
megaman2 said:
This is Megaman2 AKA Sony leader, We are not bothered about being in third but will not allow our precious console to be bashed by haters. We have the greatest console known man, a system that is build a like a tank and future proof. All we ever do is defend our console with grace, humility and passion. We set an example on this site but many struggle to reach our stature!
|
Agreed
megaman2 said: future proof. |
Too bad is isn't present-proof.
PS3 fans know they have the best system with the best games, so they shouldn't care about it's sales and should just shut up and play games.
Similarly as a Wii owner I know the Wii is the best system with the best games, so I should shut up and play games.
Of course we all know that isn't going to happen.
Agreed solid thread. Sales shouldn't make you not enjoy what you have and the ps3 still has PLENTY of support
megaman2 said:
Ps3 is $399 - Xbox 360 $199 I highly doubt the Xbox 360 priced at $399 would sell even half as well as the ps3.
|
i am so tired of seing this argument. of course it wouldn't sell the same because it doesn't offer as many options. in order for both systems to be at the same price range either the 360 would have more options added on to it or the ps3 would have less
colonelstubbs said: Because last is always an emarassing place to be in? |
Oh so how much dividends did MS pay you for your recent aquisition of an XBOX 360 ?
Honestly, if it wasn't for habit, I would not come to this site, since I rarely if ever go into threads that talk about sales. This site is purely based on sales, so of course, arguments will always boil down to which one is selling and which one is not. I'm not saying that the site is bad for that, it's good as a reference, to see the trends of how consoles / games are selling. To say that Console x is better than Console y because its selling better, is beyond stupid. It's all based on what console has the games YOU want to play and if YOU have a good time with it.
megaman2 said:
The point you had made had to be addressed with common sense.
|
Hypothetical = common sense?
Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?
ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all.
"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away"