By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Has the Xbox 360 reached it's peak in terms of graphics, Please read!!

mrstickball said:
megaman2 said:

Just stating simple facts MRstickball and no need for the playstation 3 fanboyism or else i will have to call out the troops lol keep it clean!

 

Question:

Why is a person that does NOT own a Xbox 360, or ever post in the Xbox 360 forum asking this question?

You don't care about the X360's lineup.

You don't care about what the X360 offers.

You own a Playstation 3.

So why are you arguing this? Because you want to believe the X360 has peaked, and that your Playstation 3 has not? Your the one that came in here arguing that KZ2, GT5, Heavy Rain, and others were going to 'raise the bar' and failed to mention anything about the X360 because *gasp* you don't own a 360!

Why is it, again, that you came here? To stir up trouble for a system you don't own? Why not ask Wii owners the same question? Their console is easy to develop for, and just as valid of a question. Why not ask Playstation 3 owners the question, rather than come here and stir up trouble? I'm looking at your post history, and 85% of the manufacturer postings are in Sony forums.

 

Epic post full of win!



Around the Network
Ender said:
You're laughing because you are trolling the MS forum.

Im laughing at your stupidity and ignorance.

 



Ender said:
You're laughing because you are trolling the MS forum.

Stop trolling my thread you have posted enough for the day go rest!

 



megaman2 said:
mrstickball said:

Metal Gear Solid 4 was made before Gears of War 2 was. Therefore, IGN already knew what MGS4 had (graphically) and still claimed Gears 2 looked better.

 

If that is the case would it not be rated higher than 9.5, as mgs4 got a 10 meaning Mgs4 graphically better. It won after all best graphics at vga.

Uh, no. VGA is just one of many awards/reviews out there. IGN saying that Gears 2 was the best looking game proves that not everyone thinks MGS4 is the best.

And if '10.0' means it has the best graphics, then what does that mean for Grand Theft Auto IV, which also scored a 10 in the graphics department (it was on the X360 too, in case you didn't know)?

What about Gears of War 1 that scored a 10? Does that mean it's on the same level of graphical prowess?

No. Graphics are an aspect of gameplay that continues to get better: an 8.0 in 2010 would be a 10.0 today. A 10.0 in 2006 doesn't mean it's a 10.0 today (ie, Gears 2 looks tons better than Gears 1, but Gears 2 got a lower score).

So your point about MGS4 is totally moot. If IGN says KZ2 is the best looking game, ever, that means that - up to that point in time - KZ2 will be the banner for graphics. But if IGN says that about another game in late 09, that means that the torch has been passed - in the same way MGS4 passed it to Gears 2, which MGS4 took from GTAIV.

 

 



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

mrstickball said:
megaman2 said:
mrstickball said:

Metal Gear Solid 4 was made before Gears of War 2 was. Therefore, IGN already knew what MGS4 had (graphically) and still claimed Gears 2 looked better.

 

If that is the case would it not be rated higher than 9.5, as mgs4 got a 10 meaning Mgs4 graphically better. It won after all best graphics at vga.

Uh, no. VGA is just one of many awards/reviews out there. IGN saying that Gears 2 was the best looking game proves that not everyone thinks MGS4 is the best.

And if '10.0' means it has the best graphics, then what does that mean for Grand Theft Auto IV, which also scored a 10 in the graphics department (it was on the X360 too, in case you didn't know)?

What about Gears of War 1 that scored a 10? Does that mean it's on the same level of graphical prowess?

No. Graphics are an aspect of gameplay that continues to get better: an 8.0 in 2010 would be a 10.0 today. A 10.0 in 2006 doesn't mean it's a 10.0 today (ie, Gears 2 looks tons better than Gears 1, but Gears 2 got a lower score).

So your point about MGS4 is totally moot. If IGN says KZ2 is the best looking game, ever, that means that - up to that point in time - KZ2 will be the banner for graphics. But if IGN says that about another game in late 09, that means that the torch has been passed - in the same way MGS4 passed it to Gears 2, which MGS4 took from GTAIV.

 

 

Apart from the bolded which is debatable i'd say stickball is spot on.

 




Around the Network
mrstickball said:
megaman2 said:
mrstickball said:

Metal Gear Solid 4 was made before Gears of War 2 was. Therefore, IGN already knew what MGS4 had (graphically) and still claimed Gears 2 looked better.

 

If that is the case would it not be rated higher than 9.5, as mgs4 got a 10 meaning Mgs4 graphically better. It won after all best graphics at vga.

Uh, no. VGA is just one of many awards/reviews out there. IGN saying that Gears 2 was the best looking game proves that not everyone thinks MGS4 is the best.

And if '10.0' means it has the best graphics, then what does that mean for Grand Theft Auto IV, which also scored a 10 in the graphics department (it was on the X360 too, in case you didn't know)?

What about Gears of War 1 that scored a 10? Does that mean it's on the same level of graphical prowess?

No. Graphics are an aspect of gameplay that continues to get better: an 8.0 in 2010 would be a 10.0 today. A 10.0 in 2006 doesn't mean it's a 10.0 today (ie, Gears 2 looks tons better than Gears 1, but Gears 2 got a lower score).

So your point about MGS4 is totally moot. If IGN says KZ2 is the best looking game, ever, that means that - up to that point in time - KZ2 will be the banner for graphics. But if IGN says that about another game in late 09, that means that the torch has been passed - in the same way MGS4 passed it to Gears 2, which MGS4 took from GTAIV.

 

 

From CAL4M1TY

"So you say MGS4 has the best graphics so far because it got a 10/10 in graphics on IGN? Well, Ocarina of Time also scored a 10/10 in graphics. Therefore, Ocarina = MGS4 in graphics"

 



mrstickball said:
megaman2 said:
mrstickball said:

Metal Gear Solid 4 was made before Gears of War 2 was. Therefore, IGN already knew what MGS4 had (graphically) and still claimed Gears 2 looked better.

 

If that is the case would it not be rated higher than 9.5, as mgs4 got a 10 meaning Mgs4 graphically better. It won after all best graphics at vga.

Uh, no. VGA is just one of many awards/reviews out there. IGN saying that Gears 2 was the best looking game proves that not everyone thinks MGS4 is the best.

And if '10.0' means it has the best graphics, then what does that mean for Grand Theft Auto IV, which also scored a 10 in the graphics department (it was on the X360 too, in case you didn't know)?

What about Gears of War 1 that scored a 10? Does that mean it's on the same level of graphical prowess?

No. Graphics are an aspect of gameplay that continues to get better: an 8.0 in 2010 would be a 10.0 today. A 10.0 in 2006 doesn't mean it's a 10.0 today (ie, Gears 2 looks tons better than Gears 1, but Gears 2 got a lower score).

So your point about MGS4 is totally moot. If IGN says KZ2 is the best looking game, ever, that means that - up to that point in time - KZ2 will be the banner for graphics. But if IGN says that about another game in late 09, that means that the torch has been passed - in the same way MGS4 passed it to Gears 2, which MGS4 took from GTAIV.

 

 

Nice analysis i agree, although i still think that mgs4 graphically is best of 2008 with gow2 followed closely.

 



Has the Xbox 360 reached it's peak in terms of graphics,?

Has the ps3 reached it's peak in terms of graphics,?

Has the wii reached it's peak in terms of graphics, ?

lol ,...







green_box said:
Has the Xbox 360 reached it's peak in terms of graphics,?







Only time will tell

 



Actually to be honest,both GPU hit there limits when they came out,now the devs are just making the game AROUND the gpu,and squeezing the last bits out.