Talking quality not certain genres of games, Wii lacks quality.

SSBB and SSBM i don't care whats its called, the fighting game with mario for the wii.

 well atleast we both have sigs that have true facts in them, unlike someone else *rolling eyes*

 Aah, and he proves my point. Actually and he proves naznatips point with that statement....

oh...sorry, I'll let you get back to your fanboying....

 Soon you shall notice how important it is, when it's overpowering the sales of the upcoming quality ps3 titles

That's like me saying: apart from Heavenly Sword and Lair there's nothing of quality coming to PS3. All it would prove would be my ignorance of the system as what you said proves yours.

It would also prove your ignorance of Lair's current game rankings score being a 73%. Cheap shot I know, but it strengthens my point. It's current score is 7% lower than Trauma Center, which is arguably a "quick cash-in" despite being a very good game. More proof to my point that judging any game before it's released is never justifiable.

As someone who's played the Civs since Civ 1 on the NES.  Civilization Revolution is nothing to get excited about.  I can't see anyway it could be better then a Civ on the computer unless it plays differently.  Civ was meant for the computer.  The amount of time and work people put on mods are crazy.

There are plenty of quality games coming out other than 'Metroid Prime 3', 'Super Mario Galaxy', 'Super Smash Bros Brawl', and 'Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles'.  Maybe not games of your preference, but quality games.  Not that you'd even know, you don't even know what the most hyped games are.

Sarcasm warning

It is so nice that those guys that do not own a Wii or play it on a regular basis use to this thread to show us their concern. They care so much about us that instead of playing their "better library" they`d rather post about how crappy Wii games are.

sarcasm end

It is obvious some of you have no clue about Wii library. It works like this:
1) Mainstream media says that there are a lot of mini games and bad ports for Wii
2) Wii onwers complaqim about this
3) Fanboys assume they can just attack Wii by saying the same thing
4) Trying to look unbiased they say that the good games are only Mario and Zelda (they have no idea which Mario or Zelda games, they just say it)

The problem is that some evidence can kill their arguments
1) There are more minigames for the PS2 than Wii (absolute and proportional numbers)
2) There are great ports for Wii (RE4, Scarface, Trauma Center, POP rival Swords), good minigames collection (Rayman) and decent 3rd party titles (DBZ Budokai Tenkaichi 2, Sonic and the Secret Rings, Super Swing Golf). NOT EVEN ONE NINTENDO GAME, TAKE THAT FANBOYS.
3) IF you twist things around one could say that there is nothing good on the PS3/360 aside from sports games and FPS (the ratio is higher than minigames for Wii). That is an dishonest argument considering that some of the best games on these consoles are not FPS/sports. As dishonest as saying that Wii do not/will not have anything more than minigames.

 Well what are they ?

none of you will post them, do they even exist.