That Guy said: No. Manga has roots further back than the twentieth century. It came from the Tokugawa Shogunate during the 17/18th centuries. The Shogunate was able to maintain peace for over 2 centuries and as a result, a money-based economy developed. (before, all currency was based on Rice Crop). The population increased, and cities were getting bigger and bigger. Farmers still farmed, but now that they had a disposable income and more time to work with, the came to be a demand for entertainment. Thus, the manga industry began. Within these cities, Artists and writers supported themselves, no longer by farming, but rather by writing comics and such. |
While this is true, it doesn't at all contradict that manga as it exists today stems from Osamu Tezuka.
Parokki said: A style like manga? Manga isn't a style, it's the Japanese word for cartoon/comic. There are some peculiarities and shared features amongst the works of Japanese artists, but they're nowhere near homogenous enough to call a style, especially with the amount of cross-borrowing that goes on these days. |
True enough, Manga is actually the japanese word for comic. But to say it's not a style as well is not really true. Sure, a lot of manga really strays from the others, but there are so many that are incredibly similar. There's no other name for this style, so we call it manga. If you take a look at Soriku's sig, you'll know exactly what I mean. We recognise manga-characters anywhere as just that. Manga-characters.
CAL4M1TY said: I'd say Parokki is right, it's not a style, it's a word. |
You'll find so many more similarities between any two randomly chosen anime-shows than two randomly chosen cartoons. It's not just in the style, but in the techniques as well as the themes, character archetypes, settings, etc.
It's mostly nitpicking when you say that Manga/anime is not a style. There are examples that deviate, and it's pretty diverse, but we do not have a name for that style that it all originates from other than 'manga'.
This is invisible text!