steven787 said:
This story from WND is very interesting... (WND posts 2-3 stories per day about the lawsuits, using these pieces of evidence) http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=73214 "Lawsuit disputing U.S. citizenship based in part on discredited claims" "A separate WND investigation into Obama's birth certificate utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic" "A WND investigation could not find any proof Obama used an Indonesian passport to travel to Pakistan" "The claim could not be verified by WND inquiries to Hawaiian hospitals, since state law bars the hospitals from releasing medical records to the public. Even if Obama produced authenticated proof of his birth in Hawaii, however, the suit claims that the U.S. Nationality Act of 1940 provided that minors lose their American citizenship when their parents expatriate. Since Obama's mother married an Indonesian citizen and moved to Indonesia, the suit claims, she forfeited both her and Barack's American citizenship. However, there doesn't seem to be any evidence Ann Dunham expatriated. Also, consulting citizenship experts contend that if Obama indeed obtained Indonesian citizenship, it simply would not have been recognized by the U.S., but the presidential candidate would retain his American citizenship." |
Yes, contradicting yourself is always a way to enhance your credibitlity.