LOL *I was like there hasn't been one announced yet OH shit, have they?!*
not that I'm a big fan though, I just want more Nintendo news :P
R.I.P Mr Iwata :'( | ||
LOL *I was like there hasn't been one announced yet OH shit, have they?!*
not that I'm a big fan though, I just want more Nintendo news :P
R.I.P Mr Iwata :'( | ||
Smeags said: Well said Pichu. Well said indeed. As a fellow hardcore gamer, I applaud your truthful opinion on this shameful excuse for a game. Nintendo has never been one to release a game that truly satisfies my, and many other tastes when it comes to the real gaming world. Animal Crossing: City Folk is no exception... as it looks to destroy any chance of Nintendo being a legitimate gaming company. Nintendo fanboys must now realize that their cherished company has no where to go but down. Since all of the true hardcore gamers have fled to the oasis known as HD gaming, the only audience that can potentially buy this sheep in wolves clothing (wolves are more hardcore, hence the switch) are the remaining casuals. But thanks to facts presented by Pichu, we all know this potential buyer will fall flat. It's been proven time and again that casuals don't buy games. They buy a wii (and I still don't know why they do that in the first place) and let it sit by their coasters as it collects dust. The evidence is overwhelming, and don't try to overrule these facts. Your precious VGChartz only spins the sales in Nintendo's favor. Nintendo Moneyhatting confirmed. The only ones left are the Nintendo fanboys, but even they're smart enough, which is saying a lot, to not buy this game. They know, even without their gaming licenses (they paid the price for purchasing that dust collector), that City Folk will be a game they have already purchased TWICE. Fool them once (Wild World), shame on Nintendo. Fool them twice (City Folk), shame on them! They know better, and it is my dearest hope that they will retain at least some dignity and give up on that casual shovel fest of a company. Come to the light that is HD. |
Hey wait, isn't this comment suppose to be moderated? I notice Smeags use the word fanboys in a general way but I don't see this getting moderated. What's going on? Were the forum rules different back then?
Proud to be a Californian.
RolStoppable said:
Is the word "fanboys" seriously the only issue you have with that post? |
LOL, no I don't have an issue with the post(I am not even a big Nintendo fan) I just thought some of the things he said was in line of being ban worthy :-p
Proud to be a Californian.
RolStoppable said:
It's an obvious satirical post, that's why it went without moderation. But let's assume it was a serious comment, it's the type of post that would make mods skip at least one step of the progressive moderation system because it's hardcore trolling/flamebait. |
Well I didn't know it was sarcastic post, I joined in 2013 and I thought it was serious base on some of the recent comments in this thread not to mention nobody informed me it was a joke post when I said Smeags was different back then :-/
Proud to be a Californian.
Leadified said:
|
Finding old users who don't use this site anymore, go to their threads, and find their oldest one
Simple!
(Don't do it)