By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Meet Obama's New Chief of Staff: Rahm Emmanuel

Its the position that Powell seems to be interested in. Obama probably wouldn't have a problem appointing him to a higher position, but Powell is getting pretty old and was pretty fed up with politics after working in the Bush Administration for awhile.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Around the Network
Kasz216 said:
steven787 said:
I think your missing the progressive plan, building a government, social, and economic plan around sustainability and stability.

Secretary of Education will become one of the more important cabinet positions under Obama.

Remember guys, you're the ones who think he's a Socialist. Socialists like schools.

Is he going to start federalizing schools?  Cause as it stands now the Secretary of Education is nothing but a glorfied check writer.

 

 

Schools are already paid for with federal tax dollars, he can do it different ways.  He can increase funding... or maybe start some type of school corps, fix NCLB, create some type of national education database (like a library or learning center).

Not everything is always a massive program. Sometime ideas, discussion, and planning can lead to a very effective action with very little money.

Republicans claim not to spend money on black and poor schools because you can't just throw money at the problem...

That doesn't mean you don't try to solve it.



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

There is a fairly simple method to improve education. Unfortunately, Obama does not advocate this method.



Privatize it?



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

Jump and jive it?



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Around the Network
steven787 said:
Privatize it?

I believe we should allow parents the choice on where to spend the money. As education is a private good, it only makes sense to treat it as such and allow for parental choice. It would not end public schooling as some parents would choose public schools .

 



Jackson50 said:
steven787 said:
Privatize it?

I believe we should allow parents the choice on where to spend the money. As education is a private good, it only makes sense to treat it as such and allow for parental choice. It would not end public schooling as some parents would choose public schools .

 

 

So do you want a tax credit or a welfare check for private education?



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

steven787 said:
Jackson50 said:
steven787 said:
Privatize it?

I believe we should allow parents the choice on where to spend the money. As education is a private good, it only makes sense to treat it as such and allow for parental choice. It would not end public schooling as some parents would choose public schools .

So do you want a tax credit or a welfare check for private education?

No, tax credits are not my preferred solution. There are a few ways you could accomplish parental choice. The simplest solution would be to provide the funding directly to the school the parents choose. Instead of forcing them to spend the approximately $9,000 at a public school, they could take that $9,000 to a school of their choice. Do you desire to send your child to a school that implements the Montessori method? If so, we will send the $9,000 to that school. 

 



That sounds like a pretty good idea, although how do you deal with situations in which everyone in town wants their child to go to one particular school? And how do you deal with people living closer to a school having a greater interest in going to that school for convenience?

I am just curious about a few of the logistical details. Would you include private and charter schools in the mix?



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

akuma587 said:
That sounds like a pretty good idea, although how do you deal with situations in which everyone in town wants their child to go to one particular school? And how do you deal with people living closer to a school having a greater interest in going to that school for convenience?

I am just curious about a few of the logistical details. Would you include private and charter schools in the mix?

Schools would be decided on a first-come, first-served basis. If a particular school is too popular and does not have enough spots, I imagine a second school would open that it similar. All schools would be included-private, public, and charter. I do not desire to privatize schools nor do I desire to increase the government control of schools. I simply desire that the parents and child make the best decisions relative to their respective situation.