Username2324 said:
twesterm said:
Also, you basic argument makes no sense at all. Zero.
The website wants to give people a bad impression about the game by releasing bad screenshots then they go and give it a very high score because that makes people not want the game at all.
Right. |
You mods are so arrogant sometimes.... It makes me sick.
Like I said, just lock the thread, none of you want to stay on topic and can't even figure out what the thread is about.
I already said many many times.... I notice a difference (Sometimes large, sometimes not so large) between the quality of the screenshots between the two and wanted to know what others thought about Gamespot, I got a few good responses before the F Brigade took down the thread.
|
If every thread that even a smidge off topic there would be no active threads.
Anyways, you opened up the subject so you have to be prepared to take all the criticism (assuming it's valid).
You may notice some kind of difference and I'm sure you think you do, but I'm just saying your argument makes absolutely no sense.
In a perfect world I'm sure you would only get responses where people agreed with you 100% and thought you were the greatest person at internet detectivery ever, but in real life (or real internet) people are going to disagree with you and they are going to tell you why they disagree with you. As I said, you opened up the discussion and you just have to deal with it. If you actually had some sort of strong argument, you could actually make some kind of counter argument rather than waving your arms yelling OMG stay on topic. Stay on topic!!
I told you why I disagree with your basic assumption: it makes no sense that a website would try to pass a game off as lackluster and then give it an *incredible* review score.
Garnett said:
@twesterm can i please quote that?
|
No-- I'm not a huge quote person. 
