By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - The Grieving McCain-Voters Thread

steven787 said:
I wouldn't push Gay marriage too much, because in the constituency it doesn't seem to be a very partisan issue. There are many dissenters in both groups of voters.

Democratic gay rights support may be weak (especially in certain regions) but AFAIK it's Republicans actually pushing them back.

But then again, I have the feeling I've had this conversation before, so maybe I'm wrong and there are some areas where Democrats are doing it too.



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Around the Network

Final: Obama won the "attend religious once per week or more" vote last night. Partly because the white religious people feel ripped off by Bush, and partly because of the minority turn out for democrats.

Many Democrats are not godless liberals like me. Many vote democrat because the religion says to take care of those less fortunate than themselves.



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

steven787 said:
mrstickball said:
Now what civil rights are we against, again?

Gay Marriage, Affirmative Action, Equal Education funding, Litigation legislation protecting corporations from discrimination suits...

Do you want me to keep going or do you want me to provide examples of Republican racists?

Er what?

Gay marriage isn't a civil right.  Legal recognition of economic co-dependance is.  Marriage is a religious institution, and I cannot for the life of me understand why homosexuals want a label that has identified so closely with religions that dont support them for thousands of years.

Affirmative action was a necessary policy, but in some respects it has begun to work in reverse.  I am not ready to say it should go, but it certainly needs to be reviewed.

Equal education funding?  Being Australian I can't tell you specifics of US policies but I'm guessing there is not Republican policy opposing equal access to education.

I could argue that Affirmative Action has become racist....

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

starcraft said:
steven787 said:
mrstickball said:
Now what civil rights are we against, again?

Gay Marriage, Affirmative Action, Equal Education funding, Litigation legislation protecting corporations from discrimination suits...

Do you want me to keep going or do you want me to provide examples of Republican racists?

Er what?

(1) Gay marriage isn't a civil right.  Legal recognition of economic co-dependance is.  Marriage is a religious institution, and I cannot for the life of me understand why homosexuals want a label that has identified so closely with religions that dont support them for thousands of years.

(2) Affirmative action was a necessary policy, but in some respects it has begun to work in reverse.  I am not ready to say it should go, but it certainly needs to be reviewed.

(3) Equal education funding?  Being Australian I can't tell you specifics of US policies but I'm guessing there is not Republican policy opposing equal access to education.

I could argue that Affirmative Action has become racist....

 

 

1) People said/say that about interracial marriage too.

2) Pretty much agree, but Affirmatve Action (for work places) in the U.S. isn't about quotas (though companies and universities impose them on themselves) it's just legal protection from discrimination.  It's very hard to enforce, Republicans are against strengthening it.  It was put into place to undo laws prohibiting it.

3) It's called "No Child Left Behind".  It made it legal for school districts to allocate money according to standardized test score (better score, more money)... Which schools do you think will get better funding under this plan, the school in the projects or the school in the upper middle class white neighborhood where all the kids went to private preschool and have tutors for the one's who struggle?

Affirmative action isn't perfect, but it does a lot more good than bad.  There are many things in place that work against minorities that the government can't control, allowing minorities to sue for discrimination is somethiung they can do.



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

starcraft said:
Gay marriage isn't a civil right.  Legal recognition of economic co-dependance is.  Marriage is a religious institution, and I cannot for the life of me understand why homosexuals want a label that has identified so closely with religions that dont support them for thousands of years.

If your argument is that the state should not be declaring people "married", then you would support taking that legal recognition AWAY from straight couples instead of giving it to gays?  The whole point of the civil rights angle is equal rights, so I guess that would work.  Good luck with that though.



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Around the Network
Final-Fan said:
starcraft said:
Gay marriage isn't a civil right.  Legal recognition of economic co-dependance is.  Marriage is a religious institution, and I cannot for the life of me understand why homosexuals want a label that has identified so closely with religions that dont support them for thousands of years.

If your argument is that the state should not be declaring people "married", then you would support taking that legal recognition AWAY from straight couples instead of giving it to gays?  The whole point of the civil rights angle is equal rights, so I guess that would work.  Good luck with that though.

All major religions support male-female marriage in all (normal) forms whether within or without their specific religion.

Hell, you could say they are happy to license it out to the state.

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Final-Fan said:
starcraft said:
Gay marriage isn't a civil right. Legal recognition of economic co-dependance is. Marriage is a religious institution, and I cannot for the life of me understand why homosexuals want a label that has identified so closely with religions that dont support them for thousands of years.

If your argument is that the state should not be declaring people "married", then you would support taking that legal recognition AWAY from straight couples instead of giving it to gays? The whole point of the civil rights angle is equal rights, so I guess that would work. Good luck with that though.

I talked about this in the other post.

Homosexual couples wanting "gay marriage" to be legalized are more interested is being treated the same than getting equal rights.  Those are two seperate things.  Do you think they will be happly with a different union being formed just for them which gives them the same rights? Probably not.

Until the definition of marriage is changed, there is no "gay marriage" to ban.  It is an oxymoron.  Lets ban boiling ice while we are at it.




 

starcraft said:
steven787 said:
mrstickball said:
Now what civil rights are we against, again?

Gay Marriage, Affirmative Action, Equal Education funding, Litigation legislation protecting corporations from discrimination suits...

Do you want me to keep going or do you want me to provide examples of Republican racists?

Er what?

Gay marriage isn't a civil right.  Legal recognition of economic co-dependance is.  Marriage is a religious institution, and I cannot for the life of me understand why homosexuals want a label that has identified so closely with religions that dont support them for thousands of years.

Affirmative action was a necessary policy, but in some respects it has begun to work in reverse.  I am not ready to say it should go, but it certainly needs to be reviewed.

Equal education funding?  Being Australian I can't tell you specifics of US policies but I'm guessing there is not Republican policy opposing equal access to education.

I could argue that Affirmative Action has become racist....

 

1) And you think that Republicans are against legal recognition of economic co-dependance?

2) Affirmative action was nessecary, but it does NOW need to go. All it's doing is putting unqualified people into positions and places that they are doing far more harm than good. Would you want a doctor that was put there due to AA, and not for his abililty to perform good quality surgeries? And since AA needs to go....Which party do you think will actually take a stand on bringing it down and ending racial inequalities?

3) Actually, republicans want better access to all types of schools. We have something wonderful in America called "homeschooling" and "private schools" that the Democrats absolutely hate. They also are far cheaper to fund, and give kids better education - Republicans want to give vouchers to said school choices (just as much as public school) to ensure true school choice.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

starcraft said:
Final-Fan said:
starcraft said:
Gay marriage isn't a civil right.  Legal recognition of economic co-dependance is.  Marriage is a religious institution, and I cannot for the life of me understand why homosexuals want a label that has identified so closely with religions that dont support them for thousands of years.
If your argument is that the state should not be declaring people "married", then you would support taking that legal recognition AWAY from straight couples instead of giving it to gays?  The whole point of the civil rights angle is equal rights, so I guess that would work.  Good luck with that though.
All major religions support male-female marriage in all (normal) forms whether within or without their specific religion.

Hell, you could say they are happy to license it out to the state.

So now you're against the separation of church and state?  This gets better and better.



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Senlis said:
Final-Fan said:
starcraft said:
Gay marriage isn't a civil right. Legal recognition of economic co-dependance is. Marriage is a religious institution, and I cannot for the life of me understand why homosexuals want a label that has identified so closely with religions that dont support them for thousands of years.
If your argument is that the state should not be declaring people "married", then you would support taking that legal recognition AWAY from straight couples instead of giving it to gays? The whole point of the civil rights angle is equal rights, so I guess that would work. Good luck with that though.
I talked about this in the other post.

Homosexual couples wanting "gay marriage" to be legalized are more interested is being treated the same than getting equal rights.  Those are two seperate things.  Do you think they will be happly with a different union being formed just for them which gives them the same rights? Probably not.

Until the definition of marriage is changed, there is no "gay marriage" to ban.  It is an oxymoron.  Lets ban boiling ice while we are at it.

Equal rights would be being able to achieve the same legal status as straight people.  Churches can do whatever they want but there is no reason for the state to discriminate between gay and straight couples.  Let them all be "married" in the eyes of the law, or let none of them be and call it civil union or whatever.

Also, could you point me to that other post?  I don't see any other post in this thread where you talk about gay marriage.



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom!