The crisis is only starting though. The FDIC is not an infinite supply of money either (unless money gets printed to fill it up, in which case inflation increases).

I agree with your last paragraphs though. Just notice that Paulson used to be the CEO of Goldman Sachs.

most economist believed it will go down no matter what.

it's better now than later. 

from the Market Ticker

• Public opinion is running anywhere from 100:1 to 300:1 against passing this bill, according to sources on Capitol Hill. You must return home after you pass this package to ANGRY constituents with an election less than a month away. Given the massive size of this package, the fact that it rewards the guilty on Wall Street and does nothing to address the cause that anger is fully justified.
• Non-financial private debt is $32.4 trillion dollars¹ as of 2Q 2008. Household debt is $14.0 trillion. Households lost 400 billion dollars last quarter. You wish to add $700 billion more in losses (via government obligations that taxpayers must cover) this quarter; this package is insignificant against the total bad credit outstanding. Federal capacity to “bail the system out” is insufficient.
• It will not and cannot work because the issue is trust, not money. There is lots of money (and credit) but it is being hoarded throughout the system. Consumer savings have gone from nothing to the highest rate ever in American history – in the space of a few months. Money is flying into Treasuries because of lack of trust, not lack of money. You must fix the cause of the problem, not apply band-aids.
• Commercial paper is being cited as the “lockup” that threatens an imminent financial train wreck. The truth is that commercial paper rates for “AA” rated non-financial firms is placing at a rate half that of a year ago as the Fed Funds target has been dropped from 5.25 to 2%². With risk having increased the rate of return offered is lower? This is where the stress is coming from; at last summer’s rates this paper would roll. You are being gamed by Paulson and Bernanke; look at the table in the reference and you will see that even for “threatened sectors” rates are not materially higher than last year.
• If you pass this bill and the market implodes you will be held directly responsible. There are records of thousands of signatures across seven petitions faxed to you (at my expense) dating back to October of 2007 on this topic. Many experts, including Nouriel Roubini, “Mish” Shedlock, Dr. Faber, The Weiss Institute and over 160 economists have warned Congress that this proposed plan will not work. Are you prepared to face a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal and/or USA Today exposing these facts?
• There are alternatives that will work; they all involve restoring trust and using existing market mechanisms to resolve insolvent institutions.³ While I am not particularly partial to my view on how we resolve “failed” institutions, addressing the root of the problem – lack of trust – is paramount. Three elements are involved here, they are obvious, and they must be fixed or you will FAIL.
• We only get one more shot at this; we have spent over $1.6 trillion thus far (by some estimates; $500 billion by others) attempting the same thing over and over again and it has not worked.

Nice to see you went from supporting the bailout being rejected to not supporting it as soon as you found out the Republicans were the ones who stopped it from passing.

I agree. We are fucked. I have been saying this all along. The chance to keep us out of a big recession had passed months ago. Stop screwing us over even more by trying to fix the problem. It's like trying to swim in quicksand, it only makes the problem worse.

Either way it seems like McCain was useless to help the thing after all.

Still I like his reponse better then Obamas which was basically he was blindly voting for it... and would review the plan if he was elected president. Shouldn't he have an opinion on the bill now. Since it was part of his job to vote on it?

I have always been for government regulation.  If you are referring to my comment that Americans dont support the bill because they think it helps the Middle class, that is true.

I don't remember supporting the bailout.  Like I said, I follow the Market Ticker Denninger and he's been against it from the beginning.

I didn't even know the republicans were against it until last night - watching FOX.

If I said anything to confuse anyone, I apologize for that.

That was the annual budget vote. That won't help this.

did the house reject it before the markets closed or after?

Before. It's why the market tanked.