Lem_Nx said:
pearljammer said:
The_vagabond7 said: Yes, I would oppose him. The god that the fundies propose is a monster, and a disgusting creature so far removed from sane morality that siding with him would seem to be a far more wicked act that opposing him. Anybody willing to torture billions for all eternity is not someone I would want to call master. For the ones that don't believe in hell, but rather believe he's going to just kill everyone that disagrees with a specific set of guidelines and philosophies (there are only a couple such as Jehovah's witness' that go by this belief), I still wouldn't be willing to serve someone willing to kill 99.9% of the earth's population to benefit the remaining .1%.
Regardless of what the punishment is I couldn't serve such a monster. |
What he said.
|
You are doomed to watch reruns of all of Paris Hilton's movies for eternity!
|
As bad as that sounds, wouldn't it be much more terrible if there were seperate hells for each individual person, specifically designed to maximize the, uh... tortureness.
My own personal hell would be having to attend a neverending Nickelback concert, where the only food available is fishsticks and nobody had shoes, socks or deodorant.
Conversely, my heaven would be a neverending Pearl Jam concert where everyone was wearing appropriate footware, had plenty to eat, excluding fish, and no one forgot to wear deodorant.
edit: My apologies to the OP for taking this further off topic than necessary.