By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - PoliCHARTZ - Thread of U.S. Politics & the Presidential Election

I ran across this at Yahoo Finance:

"Special Coverage: Race to the White House"

http://finance.yahoo.com/personal-finance/article/105906/Special-Coverage:-Race-to-the-White-House



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

Around the Network

Colin Powell today became the most prominent Republican to endorse Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, crossing party lines to declare Obama a "transformational" figure who would "electrify our country....and the world."

Powell said he respected John McCain, the Republican nominee, and considered him a friend. But, he said, McCain's "unsure" response to the ongoing economic crisis and his selection of a running mate who is "not ready to be president of the United States," along with an increasingly "narrow" Republican approach to deepening national problems, had led him to support Obama.

"His ability to inspire, the inclusive nature of his campaign, his reaching out all across America, who he is and his rhetorical abilities....he has both style and substance," Powell said of Obama. He said that Obama's own intellectual ability, and the experts surrounding him, had convinced him of Obama's readiness to lead the country. - Source



Kasz216 said:
Final-Fan said:
HappySqurriel said:
Kasz216 said:
Isn't that exactly what fox news was doing?  Agrees with his party 97% of the time.  Changed his Iraq War policy etc. 
One thing I would just like to add is ... You should look at a person's voting history in the context of the political/ecconomic climate that they're going to be running the country in ...

If you have voted with your party 97% of the time and the senate and house are controlled by your party there really is no checks and balances in place that would prevent the country from being run towards an untested (and probably flawed) ideology. (Note: I'm not saying the Democrat's ideology is flawed, I'm saying most ideologies are flawed).

On the other hand, if you have voted with a below-average president 90% of the time and the senate and house are controlled by the opposition party it will be very difficult to do anything that is (generally) not considered to be in the best interests of the citizens.

To put this another way ... George W. Bush really wasn't that bad of a president, and the Repbulican controlled house and senate were (also) not that bad, what was bad was the Republican's were offered a mandate which eliminated all checks and balances in the Government. Giving a mandate that is free of checks and balances to the Democrats is going to cause just as many problems as the former Republican mandate produced; they will just be different problems which may or may not be worse.

Just like in the early 1990s?
The Democrats had a majority in congress in the early 90s.  Then the he and the democratic senators both got hit by the negatives of the mild recession and both got repalced.  Leading to a Democratic President and a Republican congress... and actual real conservatives lets not go all crazy spending type ones.

Actually, the Democratic congress was not replaced until 1994.  This is largely because of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (AKA Deficit Reduction Act) which is credited with balancing the budget.  It raised taxes and cut spending.  Every single Republican in Congress (House and Senate) voted against the bill.  Republicans were able, IIRC, to hammer Democrats for raising taxes and swept into control of both House and Senate in 1994. 

The 1992 election that I believe you're referring to ("both got replaced") which threw out Bush the Elder didn't even budge Senate numbers (overall) and the House only lost about one-fourth as many seats in 1992 as in 1994. 
Senate
102nd: 56-44 to 57-43
103rd: 57-53 to 56-54
104th: 46-54 to 47-53
House
102nd: 270-164-1
103rd: 258-176-1
104th: 204-230-1
(source: Wikipedia again)



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Right now, McCain would have to win every single toss-up state and then 1-2 blue states in order to win the election. A lot can happen in 2 weeks, but not that much.



fkusumot said:

Colin Powell today became the most prominent Republican to endorse Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, crossing party lines to declare Obama a "transformational" figure who would "electrify our country....and the world."

Powell said he respected John McCain, the Republican nominee, and considered him a friend. But, he said, McCain's "unsure" response to the ongoing economic crisis and his selection of a running mate who is "not ready to be president of the United States," along with an increasingly "narrow" Republican approach to deepening national problems, had led him to support Obama.

"His ability to inspire, the inclusive nature of his campaign, his reaching out all across America, who he is and his rhetorical abilities....he has both style and substance," Powell said of Obama. He said that Obama's own intellectual ability, and the experts surrounding him, had convinced him of Obama's readiness to lead the country. - Source

Interesting.  Yeah, only thing preventing me from voting Obama is that he would make the global food crisis much much worse with the increase of ethanol in his energy plan.

 



Around the Network

I still can't believe that Powell endorsed Obama. I hope some more Republicans do, it would be a good move for sever contested house seats but I think it would also be good for the country to have a land slide, with a good amount of bipartisan support.



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

Kasz216 said:
fkusumot said:

Colin Powell today became the most prominent Republican to endorse Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, crossing party lines to declare Obama a "transformational" figure who would "electrify our country....and the world."

Powell said he respected John McCain, the Republican nominee, and considered him a friend. But, he said, McCain's "unsure" response to the ongoing economic crisis and his selection of a running mate who is "not ready to be president of the United States," along with an increasingly "narrow" Republican approach to deepening national problems, had led him to support Obama.

"His ability to inspire, the inclusive nature of his campaign, his reaching out all across America, who he is and his rhetorical abilities....he has both style and substance," Powell said of Obama. He said that Obama's own intellectual ability, and the experts surrounding him, had convinced him of Obama's readiness to lead the country. - Source

Interesting.  Yeah, only thing preventing me from voting Obama is that he would make the global food crisis much much worse with the increase of ethanol in his energy plan.

Kasz, I never figured you for a one issue voter!



Well I'm really glad she explained it.



Liberals = Leftists = anti-Americans = terrorists

10-11 min = best part

She demands that the media find out how many members of congress are leftist revolutionary anti-Americans...



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

steven787 said:
Well I'm really glad she explained it.



Liberals = Leftists = anti-Americans = terrorists

I like how in that phone message they talk about what Ayers did for 90% of the message but barely give any details as to how Obama is actually connected to Ayers.

The Republican party just needs to kill itself and start over (which may actually happen on Nov. 4th).  Its really just a shell of any value whatsoever it used to have.  Even McCain, a respectable and generally "above the fray" kind of guy, is letting his campaign be run by "boogeyman" tactics.  Its just fucking pathetic.

 



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson



There's the video again... it deleted it :(

I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.