| akuma587 said: Because the poll makers modified the website to make the poll say what it does? |
yet you use it? it just a question mark. dont need to make a big scene or anything
| akuma587 said: Because the poll makers modified the website to make the poll say what it does? |
yet you use it? it just a question mark. dont need to make a big scene or anything
| akuma587 said: Obama, because I think the Democratic Party as a whole has more to offer to our country in the next few years than the Republican Party. I also do not want to see any more conservative justices appointed to the Supreme Court. |
i agree. the only thing i dont like about democrats is the abortion.
I can safely say the current results don't surprise me. This is the internet after all.
(The domain of the "Young Voters". Well... I should say "Underage Voters".)
I sometimes wish I were alive during Rome's golden age....
About time I remember my password...
Why is the question of the week "who you will vote for?" That is a good question and I also want to know why. The question should be "whom you will vote for."
| Jackson50 said: Why is the question of the week "who you will vote for?" That is a good question and I also want to know why. The question should be "whom you will vote for." |
The question is Who would you vote for?
Whom would not make any sense in that sentence. If For was at the beginning of the sentence then it would work.

| Jackson50 said: Why is the question of the week "who you will vote for?" That is a good question and I also want to know why. The question should be "whom you will vote for." |
ACTUALLY, it should be "For whom will you vote?" if you wanna be a true grammar Natzi about it.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson
I wondered if anyone would catch my mistake. You both are correct. I should have inserted "for" at the beginning of the question as whom is the objective of the preposition. You both are awarded a bonus point.