By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - IMPEACHED PRESIDENTS

senseinobaka on 05 September 2008

Nixon was guilty as hell, but he would have been acquited because of Hillary Clinton's misconduct. He shouldnt have been so hasty to resign.

http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/c/clinton-watergate.htm

_____________________________________________________

Check out the VGC Crunch this Podcast and Blog at www.tsnetcast.com

Around the Network
megaman79 on 05 September 2008

lol, u r correct. This guy started a war that killed 100's of thousands of people and he doesn't get impeached? Its madness



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.

megaman79 on 05 September 2008
HappySqurriel said:
stof said:
Which just goes to show; if you're going to make a mistake in office, you better hope it's the kind that ends with over 100,000 killed in a foreign occupation built on lies, and not the kind that ends with semen on a girls dress.

 

George W. Bush has had the support of the House and Senate for the war in Iraq, it is (nearly) impossible to prove that Bush knew the intelligence was incorrect which is what it would take for an impeachment to be successful, and (generally speaking) voters would punish the Democrats if they did impeach Bush because it would be seen as a partisan political move.

 

Yes that support was based on lies right? So was the UN Security Council resolution support. And about his guilt, there is evidence of his own security assessments from US government agencies telling him that Saddam was never an immediate threat. Two days later he went to congress and said exactly that, there was an immediate threat from Saddam and WMD's.

Have a look for Bugliosi's evidence in his book. He's a prosecutor, not some novice.

 



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.

megaman79 on 05 September 2008

 

There you go. If u didn't know now you do.



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.