florida

It makes logical sense that an absistence only supporter would teach her daughter absistence only.  Not much of a stretch there.

No that makes absolutely no sense at all that an abstinence only supporter would teach her daughter about only abstinence.

side note: I still remember the sex ed class I took in HS (I'm from California BTW). It was like Wow! How can something that big fit through that small hole!!! LOL

QUICK QUESTION: If troopergate disqualifies Palin as a VP candidate does that mean Hillary Clinton was disqualified from the begining for Travelgate?

idk what travelgate is, but i assume it works like barracks experience.   "only when its not a democrat"

fixed for veracity.

it would have been nice if you could have actually had it make sense.

Does that mean that someone who is against teaching religion in school is necessarily against teaching religion at home?

There are lots of parents in the world who believe that art, music and physical education should not be taught in schools because they do a poor job of it, and it takes away resources from core subjects where American students are struggling; does this mean that they would (necessarily) reject students from learning about these subjects outside of a school setting? I personally grew up in a household where I played two insturments, played multiple sports, learned to draw and paint and my parents hated that the public education system devoted so many resources to programs where students gained 2 years of education in 12 years.

There are hundreds of reasons why people believe something should or should not be taught in school, you can not jump to conclusions about what they believe should be taught in the home based on what they think should be taught in schools. The only logical conclusion you can come to from knowing she supports absistence-only sexual education in school is that she supports absistence-only sexual education in school.

 Travelgate =  a rash of unethically sound job dismassals. Story goes that once Hillary Clinton became 1st lady she fired the complete white house travel staff in order to replace them with "friends." This ofcourse raised some questions and many of the travel staff were given their job back.

I definitely don't like Sara Palin, but it's not because her husband had a DWI or she was part of a 'separatist' organization (more like libertarian, which I don't see a problem with at all)

I don't like her because she's completely insane. She believes the earth is 6000 years old, she would love to see creationism taught in our classrooms, she believes in abstinence only sex education (that worked out real well for her family didn't it, with 17 year old bristol getting knocked up like that), AND she believes that rape/incest victims shouldn't be able to have abortions?!

I mean, it's one thing to be John McCain and just be a panderer, but McCain is NOT insane like this chick. I think the year 2000 McCain that called the religious right a bunch of crazies is still alive and well and he's just pandering to the RR for votes. Despicable, but definitely not crazy.

I just wish McCain had made a solid choice for VP in the event that something does happen to him... he's not exactly young vibrant, and it will be miraculous if he makes it all 4 years of his first term with no major health issues. I don't like Joe Biden either, he's a cocksucking shill of the RIAA and MPAA, but he's not an insane creationist tool like Palin.

In terms of judgement calls, Obama made a better one. What I really don't understand about Palin is why if McCain wanted a woman on his ticket, he didn't pick any of quite a few other well qualified and experienced Republican women. Palin is a pick to appease the RR, and it definitely worked considering their surge in donations after her announcement.