Thinking in black and white and good vs. evil in 2008 is fucking stupid though.
And Bush doesn't think in black and white. If he did, we'd be in Darfur instead of Iraq. Darfur is definitely black, evil, genocide in progress. Iraq is more of a grey area.
That is not a "right" wing view. Also I think Bush's stance on US intervention is it has to pose some threat or whatever to the US. (I do not agree with that in whole)
End of 2009 Predictions (Set, January 1st 2009)
Wii- 72 million 3rd Year Peak, better slate of releases
360- 37 million Should trend down slightly after 3rd year peak
PS3- 29 million Sales should pick up next year, 3rd year peak and price cut
Iraq didn't pose a threat to the U.S. though.
Unless you're talking about thinking of the world in black and white, as in oil and not-oil.
rocketpig said:
Well, let's see. You're a pretty liberal guy, and now you're going by one name. Is this in your future, Pomomo?
|
BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!
That is such a funny picture! I almost fell onto the floor when I saw that!
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson
ManusJustus said:
I like how the left gets blame for a right wing view. Fundamental religious movements, including terrorism, are far right. |
Extremists on both sides of the political spectrum can resort to terrorism and can be religious. So, terrorism and religious fundamentalism is not an indicator of political leaning.
I give that post a 9.3.
Thank god for the disable signatures option.
In their own country a lot of people view terrorists as heroes.
In our country, whenever the British were pissing us off, guess what we did? We committed terrorist acts against them! What do you think the Boston Tea Party was? Good-natured fun? No! It was terrorism!
Do we call the founding father terrorists? No! You know why? Because they were on our side!
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson
Quick question. If a DWI that resulted in no casualties, happened 24 years ago, and was committed by the candidate's spouse is fair game then why do people get pissed off when the following name is even mentioned above a whisper: Mary Jo Kopechne ?
_____________________________________________________
Check out the VGC Crunch this Podcast and Blog at www.tsnetcast.com
I am no fan of Palin, look at my post history.
This, is just ridiculous partisanship.
Let's stick to the issues. Like a pregnant kid when your running on a family values platform.
Seriously? It's not a big deal.
I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.
| steven787 said: I am no fan of Palin, look at my post history. This, is just ridiculous partisanship. Let's stick to the issues. Like a pregnant kid when your running on a family values platform. Seriously? It's not a big deal. |
Possibility 1)It's not important becuase merely having family values doesnt make someone perfect. It's not impossible to believe something and occasionally fail to live up to it. It would be a much different story if her daughter had decided to not embrace the consequences.
Possibility 2) Bristol could simply not share the same values her parents raised her with. That's not at all uncommon. And it's not refelctive of Palin's candidacy.
_____________________________________________________
Check out the VGC Crunch this Podcast and Blog at www.tsnetcast.com
| senseinobaka said: Quick question. If a DWI that resulted in no casualties, happened 24 years ago, and was committed by the candidate's spouse is fair game then why do people get pissed off when the following name is even mentioned above a whisper: Mary Jo Kopechne ?
|
Because there are many Democrats that love Teddy even though he should have done hefty prison time for that event like any person from a non-powerful political family would have.
I give that post a 9.7.
Thank god for the disable signatures option.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
