By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - This Just In- Left Wing Media Planning McCain Assination if Elected!!!

McCain is an older gentleman of 72 years of age. It is obvious age is a factor regarding him. Obama is 47, 25 years younger than McCain that is another advantage to Obama.

If elected McCain would become the oldest man elected President of the USA. 2 years older than the previous oldest President in Regan who was 70 when he became President.



Around the Network

I don't want another republican President or a woman. Well Should I care since I don't live in the U.S. anymore? Yes because the U.S. runs the whole world.



Love is whats most important.

 

Opposed to what the right wing side of the media will do if Obama is elected? This topic is fail.



You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.

ManusJustus said:

Big jon is probably the most ignorant poster here.  I disagree with a lot of you and agree with many others, but the stupidity that flows from these posts is horrendous.

It looks like someone's humour engine isn't running properly.

 

Also, way to go insulting other people's intelligence.  Bad form.

 



I'll shoot him myself if given the chance. Anarchy in the UK!

...

Wait, what?




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

Around the Network
ManusJustus said:
MrBubbles said: 

Her and McCain are pretty similar.  So why do you not like McCain and like her?

 

McCain is a hypocrite.  I dont know if you remember McCain before his most recent run for president, but he used to be seen an independent thinking, moderate leaning Republican.  When McCain decided that he would run for president in 2008, the days of independent thinking were over as John McCain became an identical puppet of Bush, hoping to gain the more conservative votes that he lost in his previous bid.

Bigjoin and others,

No, I didnt hear this from Obama last night, unlike some of you I have the ability to think for myself.  Obama's speech actually came from political scientists who compared voting record percentages among members of congress.

http://www.cqpolitics.com/cq-assets/cqmultimedia/flash/votestudy/index.html

John McCain supported president Bush 90 percent of the time.  Barack Obama supported president Bush 40 percent of the time.

 

 So let me get this straight... Your main criteria for voting on a president is whether or not he votes with president bush... Now that is ignorant. You have obviously been brainwashed by the media into believing Bush is satin incarnate...

You do realize that Lincoln was one of the least popular presidents when he was assinated. You know why? Because people said that he was wasting hundreds of thousands of lives in a "pointless" war. Hindsight is 20/20, and I believe we will look back and see Bush for who he was. A strong leader who did what he believed was right for the country regardless of what the no-nothing said.

The dems have made Iraq into what you see it as, and they have done so for political reasons.



End of 2009 Predictions (Set, January 1st 2009)

Wii- 72 million   3rd Year Peak, better slate of releases

360- 37 million   Should trend down slightly after 3rd year peak

PS3- 29 million  Sales should pick up next year, 3rd year peak and price cut

bigjon said:
ManusJustus said:
MrBubbles said: 

Her and McCain are pretty similar.  So why do you not like McCain and like her?

 

McCain is a hypocrite.  I dont know if you remember McCain before his most recent run for president, but he used to be seen an independent thinking, moderate leaning Republican.  When McCain decided that he would run for president in 2008, the days of independent thinking were over as John McCain became an identical puppet of Bush, hoping to gain the more conservative votes that he lost in his previous bid.

Bigjoin and others,

No, I didnt hear this from Obama last night, unlike some of you I have the ability to think for myself.  Obama's speech actually came from political scientists who compared voting record percentages among members of congress.

http://www.cqpolitics.com/cq-assets/cqmultimedia/flash/votestudy/index.html

John McCain supported president Bush 90 percent of the time.  Barack Obama supported president Bush 40 percent of the time.

 

 So let me get this straight... Your main criteria for voting on a president is whether or not he votes with president bush... Now that is ignorant. You have obviously been brainwashed by the media into believing Bush is satin incarnate...

You do realize that Lincoln was one of the least popular presidents when he was assinated. You know why? Because people said that he was wasting hundreds of thousands of lives in a "pointless" war. Hindsight is 20/20, and I believe we will look back and see Bush for who he was. A strong leader who did what he believed was right for the country regardless of what the no-nothing said.

The dems have made Iraq into what you see it as, and they have done so for political reasons.

Right on.

 



ManusJustus said:
bigjon said: 

The only argument the dems have is WHEN MCCAIN KEELS OVER she will be leading us.

Or worse, John McCain actually ends up leading the country.

I dont understand you're ability to see the gray areas, everything must be black and white for you.  I actually like Sarah Palin and hope the Republican Party moves in her direction, less hypocrisyand old elitists would be nice.  I'd rather see Demcorats in the White House for now, America really needs to turn their economy around and if 8 years of Republicans hasn't taught you anything then there is no hope for you.

Do you still have the American dollar being worth more than the Canadian dollar on your magazines?  Or is America too poor to change the print?

So tax cuts that helped end the recession the country was going into BEFORE Bush took office (a recession that was exacerbated by 9/11), years of sustained growth after this fast recovery, some of the lowest unemployment numbers in history, etc, but Bush gets no credit for that.

But policies mostly supported by Democrats (the poor should own houses too!), lead in part to the irrisponsible lending practices of giving mortgages to unqualified borrowers, leading to forclosures and a housing downturn, largely contributing to the slowdown we see now, that's all Bush's fault.

The economy has had a great run for most of the time Bush has been in office, but the economy is also cyclical. We are currently in a slowdown due to many different factors, most of which Bush (or any president) has no direct responsibility for or control over.

Example of media bias leading to your ignorance:

Something you will never hear from the mainstream news...
The average unemployment rate during the Bush years is running lower than during the Clinton years.

Numbers from US Misery Index

June 7, 1996-- Here is how the mainstream news (Dan Rather) reported that the unemployment rate jumped up to 5.6%:

“The government came out today with its latest report on unemployment. It says the unemployment rate rose slightly, 2/10ths of a point last month, up to 5.6 percent – still low overall. And the numbers, pure and simple, can be misleading. Economics correspondent Ray Brady tonight has the story behind them.”

January 4, 2007-- And, here is how the AP reported on the current unemployment rate of 5.0%:

Hiring practically stalled in December, driving the nation's unemployment rate up to a two-year high of 5 percent and fanning fears of a recession.

Employers last month added the fewest new jobs to their payrolls in more than four years, according to the employment report released Friday by the Labor Department. The report showed that employment conditions are deteriorating, strained by a housing slump and credit crunch that are sapping economic strength.

"The economy is getting hit by some body blows. The big question is whether the economy can withstand it or will it take a fall," said Ken Mayland, president of ClearView Economics.

UPDATE: Here's CNN's headline :
"Jobs weak, unemployment soars"
Since when is a 5% unemplyment rate described as soaring?



I feel your pain Timmah. People just regurgitate what they hear on the news, which is always slanted in some direction.

 

But I still feel this topic is a complete joke, as are the vast majority of political topics on this site or most sites.



You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.

Timmah! said:


Since when is a 5% unemplyment rate described as soaring?

 

when it gets the media more viewers



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur