ManusJustus said:
| bigjon said:
The only argument the dems have is WHEN MCCAIN KEELS OVER she will be leading us.
|
Or worse, John McCain actually ends up leading the country.
I dont understand you're ability to see the gray areas, everything must be black and white for you. I actually like Sarah Palin and hope the Republican Party moves in her direction, less hypocrisyand old elitists would be nice. I'd rather see Demcorats in the White House for now, America really needs to turn their economy around and if 8 years of Republicans hasn't taught you anything then there is no hope for you.
Do you still have the American dollar being worth more than the Canadian dollar on your magazines? Or is America too poor to change the print?
|
So tax cuts that helped end the recession the country was going into BEFORE Bush took office (a recession that was exacerbated by 9/11), years of sustained growth after this fast recovery, some of the lowest unemployment numbers in history, etc, but Bush gets no credit for that.
But policies mostly supported by Democrats (the poor should own houses too!), lead in part to the irrisponsible lending practices of giving mortgages to unqualified borrowers, leading to forclosures and a housing downturn, largely contributing to the slowdown we see now, that's all Bush's fault.
The economy has had a great run for most of the time Bush has been in office, but the economy is also cyclical. We are currently in a slowdown due to many different factors, most of which Bush (or any president) has no direct responsibility for or control over.
Example of media bias leading to your ignorance:
Something you will never hear from the mainstream news...
The average unemployment rate during the Bush years is running lower than during the Clinton years.

Numbers from US Misery Index
June 7, 1996-- Here is how the mainstream news (Dan Rather) reported that the unemployment rate jumped up to 5.6%:
“The government came out today with its latest report on unemployment. It says the unemployment rate rose slightly, 2/10ths of a point last month, up to 5.6 percent – still low overall. And the numbers, pure and simple, can be misleading. Economics correspondent Ray Brady tonight has the story behind them.”
January 4, 2007-- And, here is how the AP reported on the current unemployment rate of 5.0%:
Hiring practically stalled in December, driving the nation's unemployment rate up to a two-year high of 5 percent and fanning fears of a recession.
Employers last month added the fewest new jobs to their payrolls in more than four years, according to the employment report released Friday by the Labor Department. The report showed that employment conditions are deteriorating, strained by a housing slump and credit crunch that are sapping economic strength.
"The economy is getting hit by some body blows. The big question is whether the economy can withstand it or will it take a fall," said Ken Mayland, president of ClearView Economics.
UPDATE: Here's CNN's headline :
"Jobs weak, unemployment soars"
Since when is a 5% unemplyment rate described as soaring?