By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Dispelling the Myth of PS3 Exclusives

Jhriad on 27 August 2008
bluesinG said:
jerry133 said:

I apologize for being indirect. I was attempting to ineloquently mock all of your qualifying statements. I assumed it was your intent to make the PS3 look bad by listing a whole two exclusives and I was trying (with limited success) to show that even the almighty Xbox or for that matter the Wii could have its massive library cut to one title with enough qualifyers. Which makes yours or my list of exclusives very 'misleading' which is why I included the phrase "Helpful wasn't it?" If that wasn't your intent that i do apologize.

The point I was trying to make (also indirectly) is that almost all of the PS3's good exclusives are published by Sony. I would assume that the same is true for the 360/Microsoft and the Wii/Nintendo.

I just thought that the original poster was reading too much into their list. As long as Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo keep publishing good games, all 3 consoles will have good exclusives. It's the good third-party exclusives that are becoming more and more difficult to come by without handing out a load of cash.

 

You do understand that just because something is published by Sony doesn't mean it's "First Party" or that Sony owns the IP or anything right?  While most First Party titles are published by Sony that doesn't mean that everything that Sony publishes is First Party.

Also, why is everyone forgetting to put Disgaea 3 on the PS3 lists?  It's exclusive and was released via retail yesterday.  You can also remove Metal Gear Online from those lists as well since it is included in MGS4 and doesn't ship in a separate retail packaget (yet).