By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - What I don't get...

Why do people say the the Bushes are a political dynasty.  Are they forgetting the Adams (both father and son=Prez), the Kennedys (US prez, Dem. candidate, and Senators).  Maybe it is the American way of not remembering their history.



Around the Network

Who is saying that? And don't forget Jeb. Oh, and while I don't think it's a dynasty, you can have more then one :p



1) People have a short memory
2) It has been a long time since two people with the same names (were the Adams people related?) have served in the executive branch.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

When those people say the bushes are a political dynasty they are not saying the adams aren't mate. Or do they?

I never have heard about those adams only the addams family.



The Adamses were pretty far apart (around 30 years) as opposed to 8 years with the Bushes, which probably has something to do with ti.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Around the Network
akuma587 said:
1) People have a short memory
2) It has been a long time since two people with the same names (were the Adams people related?) have served in the executive branch.

My 1st post--Why do people say the the Bushes are a political dynasty.  Are they forgetting the Adams (both father and son=Prez), the Kennedys (US prez, Dem. candidate, and Senators).  Maybe it is the American way of not remembering their history. 

Read my posts, man.



The Kennedy's for sure are a dynasty, but I think people tend to look back favorably on the Kennedy's because their family has had such shitty luck, and not many people have negative opinions of them. Only one of them served in the executive branch too, the branch where obviously power is concentrated mostly in one person's hands.

The word "dynasty" has a negative connotation to it which people generally ascribe to a group they are uncomfortable with, such as the Bush Dynasty or the potential Clinton Dynasty.

The Adams thing was simply too long ago for anyone to worry about, but it is a valid point.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

halogamer1989 said:

Maybe it is the American way of not remembering their history.

 

What have we learned from history? We learned that we don't learn from history.



The Bushes are a political dynasty.

Are you trying to disprove that by saying that there is more than one?

That's irrelevant.



The Ghost of RubangB said:
The Bushes are a political dynasty.

Are you trying to disprove that by saying that there is more than one?

That's irrelevant.

 

But by saying, everyone else does it will make them less bad?