Reminds me of that episode of "The Simpsons" where Homer designed a car, and included everything he could think of. He wound up bankrupting his rich brother.

This topic comes up over and over, and it always is about who the biggest loser is. I think the most intersting thing is that Nintendo has never lost money. Even when they were dead last in a gen, they still made lots of money. I read somewhere that they've only had one quarter since the NES in which they posted a loss, and (during the same time) never posted one for a fiscal year.

Well, here's the definition for you. Maybe there is no ground for you to say anything, before you know the true defintion of the word rather then jumping to conclusions.

Opinion:A belief or conclusion held with confidence but not substantiated by positive knowledge or proof.

Oh and here's the definition of condifence as well, because I'm sure you'll make another conslusion, because you don't know the definition of confidence either.

Confidence:Trust or faith in a person or thing.

So by using semantics you're hoping to get out of this? If there was any validity to your original argument you wouldn't have been reduced to this pathetic display of splitting hairs.

I mean for the love of god you're trying to cop out using the semantic nuances of a self-imposed distinction in definition. Even then the given meaning of the discussion was equally understood by both parties so trying to pull a, "Dur-hur, that's not what the definition says" after you've already acknowledged the agreed upon meaning several times previous to this in our exchange.

You can't default on an argument of definition and semantics when you've already been playing by the very definition you're trying to challenge.

----

But even then, you're saying you have confidence in a Company that has shot its profit margins to hell with a sloppy and poorly planned product. Shot the PS3 in the foot by not only making it too over-engineered and poorly prepaired for development but too expensive largely thanks to an unecessary propriotary format that benefits gaming only when forced to. I guess the PS and PS2 game libraries are worthless because backwards compatibility is a thing of the past, perhaps someday the PS3's game library you claim is so great won't mean a hill of beans to you either when the PS4 comes out. Isn't Six-Axis great? It's the best thing ever isn't it? And Sony's new motion controls, what a novel idea. Though, in all seriousness, hasn't it ever bothered you that everything you claim is so great about the PS3 requires an investment of several thousand dollars on the behalf of the consumer just to even take part of it in anyway benefitial beyond that of the competition? Does covering your ears and screaming, "SONY WILL WIN" not strike you in the least bit as dillusional?

Has the recent events in the Video Gaming market forced you Sony fanboys over the edge? Have you all gone bonkers, all of a sudden our forums are flooded with these insane proclamations of faith and loyalty to a brand that has thrown away everything they've achieved with the PS and PS2.