To be fair, I did click the pdf and briefly lookover it. 

I think it's a bit on the optimistic side (to say the least) to expect your average forum goer to ready something 3 pages long, let alone 29 pages.

@ Bursche
There was?! Dang, I need to go on vacation less often. :(

Yep.  I never read it but I heard it had dead babies inside.

it is not for you or me to decide wether or not a pregnant woman has her child or not, its her body and its her choice

@ PS360
But it's a human! Killing humans is wrong! And if she doesn't want babbies, then she shouldn't have sex (or at least use protection)

I read a good portion of your article.

I find it disturbing that a large part of his argument (that I have read) is that if you allow abortions, eventually people will ask for the right to kill the elderly (without their consent) and infants. His argument is that that is how it happened in Nazi Germany. He fails to mention that America's system of government makes it pretty much impossible for a Fuhrer like figure to be granted any kind of Supreme Power.

He directly compares abortions to the Holocaust and justifies this by quoting dehumanizing arguments from people who are probably far far from the mainstream pro-choice point of view.

its not a human untill its born, so its not murder untill it has been born, and also you do know that sometimes women are raped or protection dosent work

@ PS360
Of course it's human before it's born. It has a working heart, and a working brain.
And you should at least skim the article if you're talking about rape or accidental pregnencies

scientifically speaking pre-birth its known as a "fetus", and its organs are not fully develped till later in pregnancy, so if you use that argumeent, you should at least allow early in pregnancy abortions

Perhaps it's because a joke argument begets a joke response.

See, the essay that has been provided is a gorram joke!