By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Is buying BluRay movies worth it if you own a PS3?

46" is easily big enough to see the difference in blu-ray and upscaling



Around the Network

Maybe your right, I walked into all my rooms and I notice that all my TV's are over 8-10 feet away from seats/couches.


Maybe thats my problem.... Should consider moving the Items closer.  LMFAO



PS4 Preordered - 06/11/2013 @09:30am

XBox One Preordered - 06/19/2013 @07:57pm

"I don't trust #XboxOne & #Kinect 2.0, it's always connected" as you tweet from your smartphone - irony 0_o

twesterm said:
sega4life said:
Yakuzaice said:
sega4life said:

 

 

 

If your TV is UNDER 46inches, Do Not Buy Blu-Ray Movies, there is no need.

DVD's are fine With-Out Upscale on 46inch TV's and below.

Like stated above the PS3 upscales DVD's that look almost identiacl to BR's on even a 54inch, I know, I own a 54inch and did not see a diffrence with my DvD compaired to BR of Talladega Nights (came with PS3), only BR I owned.

 

I haven't seen Talladega Nights, so I can't say what the quality is on that specific movie, but....  This is so untrue.  I have a 56" 1080p DLP and a 32" 720p LCD, and there is a huge difference on my DLP, and a very noticable difference on my LCD (between BR and upscaled).  Saying a non-upscaled dvd looks the same as a blu-ray at 46" is ridiculous.

Anyways, personally I haven't purchased a DVD (besides some tv shows) since I bought my PS3.  There is a quality difference, you just have to decide if it is worth it to pay more.  Nobody can really make that decision for you.

Oh, and at the OP, why on earth would you pay $30-40 for blu-rays, or $15-20 for DVD's.

 

 

Sorry but saying an Upscale-DvD on a 46inch looks the same as BR on a 46inch, is not Ridiculous.


Blu-ray on a 46inch and lower is a waste of money, plain and simple.

The whole reason why you get Blu-Ray and 7.1ss is to have the best of the best, throw in a small tv and you just screwed the whole setup.

 

46" is small?

 

Pitifully.

 



No thread about blu-ray is complete without the good ol' viewing distance chart:




it looks better but depends on how much you like that certain movie if you want to spend the extra money on bluray for your favorite movie then its a good deal but just every movie dosent seem worth it to me



Around the Network
twesterm said:
makingmusic476 said:
twesterm said:
Yakuzaice said:

Oh, and at the OP, why on earth would you pay $30-40 for blu-rays, or $15-20 for DVD's.

 

I don't, that's just how much they cost unless you happen to find a sale. 

 

When new Blu-Rays come out they're usually ~$18 the first day at Best Buy (that's how much I paid for Batman Begins a few weeks ago).

Although Fox's titles generally cost more.  They rip you off for everything, I swear.  Even Independence Day, as old as it is, was $40 when it first came out.

Wal-mart also has good prices on BDs, like $20-25.  Except for Fox's titles, yet again.

Are you sure about that?  I know about up until about a month or so ago they had a huge sell where just about every BluRay title was $15 dollars.  If you go there now they're all full price again, or at least they are at mine.

Pharaoh said:
yeah why are you paying 30-40 dollars per blu-ray?!?! I have a collection of 34 blu-ray movies, and have never paid over 30 for any of them. Most of them you can buy for about 20 dollars.

About the difference in quality, you can see a marginal difference on older titles that were originally shot without HD quality when upscaled. But on newer titles, there is a HUGEEEEE difference in quality between upscaled and blu-ray at 1080p. Check out 300 or casino royale, some of the best quality in blu-ray.

Blu-ray is awesome can't go back to DVD now, too spoiled

 

Actually, 300 was one of the movies I got to compare (it was one of the ones I replaced so I had both versions for a day or so) and I couldn't really tell a difference.

 

 

Well, I haven't been to Wal-mart in awhile, but when I was hunting for Batman Begins, the prices seemed pretty low across the board.

Also, keep in mind that 300 has a LOT of grain.   The image looks great to me, but I know a guy who swears that the upscaled version actually shows more detail.  To me, the Blu-Ray version just looks...neater.  I guess it's because it's more like what the director intended compared to the DVD, or something.

Casino Royale, Pirates of the Carribean 1-3, and HP 4/5 all have excellent PQ, some of the best out there, so I would definitely check out those to compare. 

Spiderman 3 also, if you can force yourself to sit through that again. :P



Obliterator1700 said:
I only own 1 Blue-Ray movie, Thats "Spiderman3".

It looks better on Blue-Ray...Its not worth the 30-40dollar price btw.

 

actually its 20 - 30 dollars.

Amazon typically being the cheapest.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
ssj12 said:
Obliterator1700 said:
I only own 1 Blue-Ray movie, Thats "Spiderman3".

It looks better on Blue-Ray...Its not worth the 30-40dollar price btw.

 

actually its 20 - 30 dollars.

Amazon typically being the cheapest.

 

I miss the days of Amazon B1G1s.  HD DVD was at least good for something...



There was a very good chart I saw a while back that showed the distance at which an individual (with 20/20 vision) must be within to notice the difference between 480, 720 and 1080 lines of resolution compared to the relative size of the screen (say from 20" to 120"). There is a definite diagonal scale.

Whether an individual with 20/20 vision can notice the difference between various resolutions depends entirely upon both size of the display and the viewing distance.

Sit back far enough from a give display size, say 50 feet from a 20" display as an extreme example, and you won't be able to tell the difference between even a sub SD (ex. 480x320) picture scaled out to fit the entire display, and a native 1080p signal, even assuming the display is a native 1080p display (like a computer monitor, rather than a flat screen TV).

Stand close enough that same 20" screen (computer monitor viewing distances for example), and you can easily discern the difference between a 480p upscaled picture and a 1080p native picture.

Read text on a monitor at various resolution settings at various distances to see the difference it can make on the same size display.

The difference becomes more distinct, the larger the display.

More pixels from both the video source, as well as the max native resolution of the display will ALWAYS mean more detail can be rendered. There is no way of interpolating data to cheat this. As is the case with resizing a 720x480 image in Photoshop to a 1920x1080 image, new data cannot be "made" only interpolated to the nearest adjacent approximation.

But if an individual really can't tell, or has a hard time telling the difference, then there really isn't much reason to be paying a premium for HD media, and there's no point in even asking the question.

And as it's been mentioned, there is a pretty wide gamut of quality for HD media, depending upon the master source and whether the master was cleaned up before transfer, in addition to several other factors.

Put simply, some of the worst HD media transfers barely look better than a well mastered DVD. Given a poor enough source, an HD transfer could actually look worse than a cleaned up DVD transfer.

So if the premium price is an issue, either wait for your favorite movies to go on sale, or check with the HD media review sites to see if the transfer really is worth the extra money.

Also, there are plenty of titles that really don't need to seen in HD, unless you're simply trying to add to your HD collection, for whatever reason.



makingmusic476 said:
ssj12 said:
Obliterator1700 said:
I only own 1 Blue-Ray movie, Thats "Spiderman3".

It looks better on Blue-Ray...Its not worth the 30-40dollar price btw.

 

actually its 20 - 30 dollars.

Amazon typically being the cheapest.

 

I miss the days of Amazon B1G1s.  HD DVD was at least good for something...

Yes it was.

Although admittedly, I picked up quite a few B-RDs I wouldn't have normally bought had they not been from BoGo deals. It's like "why did I buy these movies on HD media again?! Oh right, they were half off."

On the other hand, I have been picking up quite a few HD-DVDs now that inventory is being cleared through fire sales. Most of the stock at Fry's is $10@ and they have hundreds of titles.