By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - What gaming editors opinion do you actually take serious anymore?

The editors opinions or reviews that I take serious like to read/hear anymore are Greg Millers,Craig Harris.Daemon Hatfield,Shane Bettenhausen, Garnett Lee, and someone else from the IGN playstation team forgot his name but he sings at the end of the Podcast Beyond podcast.

I used to care about Matt Casamasina and Bozons opinions but now I dont give a shit. I usually disagree and the way they back their opinions up suck.

If im not reading a review or preview from the any of the people in bold (and the singer) I wont take their opinion seriously and just read some of it to get some information.
Which is why most reviews I dont listen to and some people really take reviews/previews way too seriously.

 

 

 



Around the Network

none



              Can love bloom on the battlefield?                 Proud supporter of this gen!!!

                       

Dystopian Delight said:
none

Seconded.

 



None. They are just like every other media now. Took the gaming media a little longer to get there but now they are fully there. All about the views instead of the substance.



I don't.

To a point the reviews in Official Nintendo Magazine usually agree with my view, but they can be too lenient sometimes (Donkey Kong games)

I don't take the internet, or anything from it seriously.



Around the Network

Reviews from "professionals" are the same as reviews from "amateurs". They are all just opinions. Unless they are affected by some sort of financial incentive to the reviewer the only thing different from someone like Matt on IGN vs. any one of us is the fact that he gets to play a lot more games than we do and therefore has a broader perspective.



Keep this in mind when reading what I type...

I've been gaming longer than many of you have been alive.

Furthermore, IMO, the best way to evaluate whether or not a game is for you is to read as many reviews as possible to get a wide variety of opinions. The only reviews I really don't take seriously are when somebody very obviously doesn't like a certain genre, but then reviews the game negatively.



Keep this in mind when reading what I type...

I've been gaming longer than many of you have been alive.

Why would anyone's opinion matter more than anyone else's? All opinions should be taken with a grain of salt. That is why information from all news channels must be scrubbed clean of their agendas before the facts can be gathered.



As a jRPG fan, I haven't taken too many seriously in a long time. 90% of reviewers rate jRPGs in "I'd rather be playing Halo than reviewing this crap."



"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."  --Hermann Goering, leading Nazi party member, at the Nuremberg War Crime Trials 

 

Conservatives:  Pushing for a small enough government to be a guest in your living room, or even better - your uterus.

 

IGN. I always take IGNs reviews as law. They're the only company I know that plays games to fruition before reviewing them. That gets massive points in my book. And by and large, they're the least biased review site of them all.