I want this!

Who is coming up with excuses?

I merely was replying to this question: "Just curious, what do you use it if not roms? Mp3 on the DS? Don't know many that hear music on their handheld."

I think I made that perfectly clear. I even cited an example and a freeware multimedia package for the DS. Hell, I'm even CREDITING the DS for its homebrew and hacking capabilities, something hardly anyone knows about, and something no one comments about!

BTW, you may not know this, but I haven't touched my PSP for AGES, simply because for its primary function, playing games, the DS sodomizes the PSP in my opinion.

But regardless, your beef is because I stated that a Sony product, primary, secondary, tertiary usage or whatever, can do something better than a Nintendo product. Guess what? It can. The PSP tech sheet obliterates the DS spec sheet in multimedia capabilities. It produces far more polygons. Its sound quality is far superior. Its screen packs far more pixel density and is a pleasure to watch movies on, which BTW the PSP utterly gang-bangs the DS when it comes to watching movies. I never once mentioned that the PSP was better or worse for games. But you know something? You completely miss the point because you, apart from being a troll of the utmost worst bastardization, you are completely blinded by corporatism - Nintendo=good, Sony=bad.

The fact is that the PSP was designed to not only handle games, but play movies, listen to music, essentially be a portable multimedia machine.

The DS was designed to only be a game machine. No wonder the DS can't outmuscle the PSP in multimedia, because the PSP was designed to handle all those tasks with aplomb. The DS wasn't. Period. No amount of fudging the facts is going to change this reality.

The DS is not as good as the PSP for homebrew and hacks. Period. Get over it, deal with it, live with it.

But for games, the DS is far, far superior to the PSP according to no one else but me.

OK, since GTrollback can NEVER let a post go without actually having the last word, let's see how long before it rears its ugly head again. I hope I am proven wrong, but I just know that is genetically impossible in trolls.

For the record, in the GBA version, you can choose your final party, incliding Edward, the Twins, Yang, and everyone get's an ultimate weapon as well.

Who the hell wants Edward in their final party?

Finally, another FF on DS. Im excited. I still play FFIII for DS.  I'm glad its longer, cause it can never be too long.

Now THAT is how you do a remake.

I just (recently) finished FF3. Took me around 40hrs, game was well balanced (difficult in places, without being silly) and a lot of fun. If FF4 is anything like FF3, count me in.

(PS - my main issue with the game was wayyyy too many battles/repetitive. Give me harder battles, and less of them anyday. In places it literally was battle, 10 steps, battle, 10 steps, etc...).

Yeah, Sullah is somewhat correct. It's script, not entire game time technically. Still, Final Fantasy IV moved very quickly, often barely touching on many major plot points (especially Cecil's past) so I'm not surprised to learn that much of the original script was removed. If it's added back in correctly, along with the new graphics and some new features to increase replay value (as stated by an IGN interview) the game could truly be an amazing remake. IGN says about replay:


Tokita revealed that there are some big plans under way to make players play a second time. This is not limited to just restarting a game in a powerful condition, explained Asano.