steverhcp02 said: LordTheNightKnight said: makingmusic476 said: LordTheNightKnight said: makingmusic476 said: Michael Bay's thoughts on the format war (from Michael Bay's forum):
What you don't understand is corporate politics. Microsoft wants both formats to fail so they can be heroes and make the world move to digital downloads. That is the dirty secret no one is talking about. That is why Microsoft is handing out $100 million dollar checks to studios just embrace the HD DVD and not the leading, and superior Blu Ray. They want confusion in the market until they perfect the digital downloads. Time will tell and you will see the truth.
Michael Bay, Steven Spielberg, and Ridley Scott have all been very pro-Blu-Ray from the start. It's most likely because, as Directors, they feel that the added capacity and higher bitrates of Blu-Ray will lead to a better representation of their films. |
So it will be really interesting to see if the 3 layer HD-DVD changes this, assuming your guess is correct. |
That doesn't solve the bitrate limitation. |
Yes it does. Blu-ray's higher bitrates come from the higher capacity. |
you have NO idea what youre talking about. First you say amazon isnt in Nielsen...now this crap....seriously, learn what youre argueing. |
No, you don't. BDA made it clear they are using the higher capacity of those discs to achieve a higher bitrate for the video. That clearly means that the triple layer discs matching it would allow the higher bitrate as well.
This doesn't mean HD-DVD can pull ahead, or do you and makingmusic think the higher bitrates are the reason blu-ray is ahead, so cannot admit HD-DVD might match it?*
It will take something else, like dropping prices on discs, to help HD-DVD.
And so far, it's just Sony that claims Amazon is in nielson, so they can deny Transformers sold so well (and it's not about that movie's format; like 300, Transformers was a crowd pleaser, while Spiderman 3 and Shrek 3 weren't).
*making music, you didn't even read what I wrote. I clearly wrote that the maximum reasonable bitrate for 50GB discs is 24mbs, which is LOWER than 36mbs.
And even if a blu-ray film was encoded at 54mbs, that wouldn't help. I also pointed out that 24mbs allows 3-4 hours of video. You can replace the 4th hour with extra feature and audio. Going at a higher bitrate would lose the room for those, so it would be pointless. And don't think those 100GB discs would help, not until the dual layer yields get better (they will, but it's taking a while).