they had mixed feelings about the game after playing it last night in an too human event held by microsoft.

they say graphics are nothing special and some of them believe neither was the gameplay(or the puzzles for that matter,,, I didn't know this game had puzzles )

They add that if the game is released in the stage that was last night, it would be a big dissapointment (it's stated at the end of article)

one of the previewers liked it thought.

I think  they still have some development time left to improve,,,but cutting multiplayer section of he game into half last month was a bad sign.

http://www.gameplayer.com.au/gp_documents/Too-Human-Event.aspx?catid=Previews&Page=1

damn, hopefully the review build is fine.

I never had any interest in Haze, but I've always had a bit of interest in Too Human. I hope it turns out well.

Too Human will turn out like Lair. Epic failure.

Gosh, now is the question. Should we actually believe what Spartan says?

After all, he isn't a fanboy at all!

Did you miss the big link at the bottom?

No, i'm fairly sure he is exaggerating it all though.

Sarcasm is the lamest style of humour

It's a five page article.  The first paragraph is this:

That doesn't sound good for the rest of the article.

Okay, I'll change my mind, Gameplayer.com.au are the fanboys.

Don't worry, the game will be good..