Please stop adding stupid arguments to an already bad post.  He doesn't include last gen/current gen exclusives.  If he will leave Twilight Princess off the Wii list you can bet he's not gonna add back in Ninja Gaiden.  Remake or not, it's the same game with better graphics.

Silent Hill 5: "According to an interview with the project's chief designer Masashi Tsuboyama back in 2004, it would appear on the next-gen console, considering between the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 (which was then still referred to as the Xbox 2); however, sources such as IGN have reported rumors of a PS3 release [1]. As of April 2007, Yamaoka confessed that Konami was still unsure about which console to release the title on, but did reply, "We are thinking of putting the next game on the next generation consoles like PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360, but we have had a good past experience with PlayStation [where the series was born] and we hope to continue that trend, but there are no definite plans as of yet."[2]"  This is taken from Wikipedia. Please stop making yourself look ignorant.  This topic needs to be locked if people keep this crap up.

if u own all three consoles excusives shouldnt matter thats why fanboyism needs to end so they can enjoy all games whether its Mario Galaxy, Halo 3 or MGS 4 because fanboys will missed out on great games unless that console really sucks

you were the one who told us to let it die, and now you're keeping it alive! =)  time for you to practise what you preach (and yes, I know I said I would let it die. This is my last post, promise!)

KingJFS

Thanks for your input. URNotE's list is just every possible game that could be an exclusive to PS3 (and many that are confirmed not to be) so of course it's going to be biased. It is designed to look good for the PS3, because it was written by a PS3 fanboy. Of course he states that PS3 has the most exclusives without pointing out how many Wii exclusives there are (which would be much larger if you include rumoured and untitled games. Which is stupid anyway, since they are pure speculaton)

Keep up the good work. 

I don't really agree but i guess you can argue whether Wii play is a mediocre title or not.

But Wii Sports is a mediocre title? Times magazine call it game of the year and many many magazine/website call it game of the year/most important game of the year/similar awards then how can you call it mediocre?   It's okie if you don't like it, but calling Wii Sports mediocre IS PATHETIC.

1) http://silenthill5.net/?subaction=showfull&id=1180447154

"Tsuboyama-san: Like I said, we only have ideas but we have been assessing next-generation consoles such as Sony's Playstation 3. We have looked at other consoles too but they exact limitations which could delay progress. We have not decided the console yet."

2) So what is a REMAKE then??? And how remake differs from the port?

wow!!
thank for the list.

Hey, thanks for the great thread, it gave me a few good laughs at 2AM.

Here's the thing people, counting exclusives before they're released is absolutely silly.  Until they are actually released you don't know they're exclusives because things change all the time.  Case in point, look at a game like GTAIV.  It was originally an exclusive then went multiplatform.

As for timed exclusives, those aren't exclusives.  It's that simple.

Finally, for something like RE4, that game was an exclusive and could be on that list when it was first released because there weren't any planned ports of it at the time of release.

There.  Thread solved and you can all stop bickering.

Maybe it would be better to count them as exclusives once they are actually released on each console.

Anyone want to list the exclusives currently available on each console?

I gotta give you credit for tracking all of these tidbit games down. I looked up Aqua Vita and the best I can figure is that it's a screensaver game that uses the eye toy.

I guess it's pretty obvious that he stacked Downloadable content on there, I guess that means that he would stick even the most absurd of titles on there too. If I were to go to that level of detail on the Wii games I could bring up 200 games, that were of higher quality than a screensaver/eyetoy game. Virtual Console hit 100 games not long ago :)

I'm somewhat amused that you included "Lemmings" as a original title. At least Rampart wasn't on that list, somehow they managed to make a game that was 20 dollars 15 years ago on the SNES worth under 5.

I'd classify this as wishful thinking, but I'll give my honest opinion. If that Shin Megami Tenshin game is another Digital Devil Saga, another Suikoden was in production, another Wild Arms, or hell, if they fix the firmware update that will mean it will be worth it to play PS2 games on the system (DVD movies looked beautiful. FFXII looked like it was FFIX. This was after firmware update 1.80, and I was told it was a huge improvement) then since I can buy a ps3 for 400 bucks right now, it's worth it.

But right now, since Smash Brothers Brawl is actually a real game, the potential of the Wii appears infinitely higher to me rather than a simple list of possibly. As a poor person, I don't buy on potential, I buy on reality.