| Ajax said: ok, of course you've got a point like I also said, popularity doesn't by definition equal quality of course, but you must watch out with these kinds of comparison like with that flies comparison, 'cause this one is also a bit false; cause McDonalds is less good than a good restaurant of course, but that's comparing totally different genre's. You can say that in the fastfood genre, McDonalds actually is one of the best, and it isn't so popular for nothing. Just like you could say the plot of Metal Gear actually is quite good, but of course not when compared to great books and novels made by some of the great minds in the last centuries who have been writing stuff down.. also with the wii comparison.. the Wii actually IS great, but you must see it in a certain context and genre.. if you understand what I mean |
Ok lets compare apples to apples in as direct a manner as possible. Firefly is hands down the best sci-fi show I have seen ever. It was not just good for a sci-fi series, but good for a television series in general. It is in every way possible better than Stargate SG-1. Firefly has a small dedicated fanbase that never got very large. Stargate SG-1 has a legion of fans large enough to spawn two different spin-offs, a couple of direct to DVD movies, and 10 seasons. Popularity does not mean quality.








