By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Gears of War 2 gameplay

starcraft on 10 May 2008

I'm guessing 30fps. I doubt either high-def console can run that kind of stuff at 60fps, least of all at 1080p.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Around the Network
sc94597 on 10 May 2008
starcraft said:
I'm guessing 30fps. I doubt either high-def console can run that kind of stuff at 60fps, least of all at 1080p.

 It's going to be 1080p?



sc94597 on 10 May 2008
UltimateFighter said:
That was amazing it really was.This game aint even done and it looked 150%.Graphically it look like something a console shouldn't be able to do this gen.I cant believe how good it looks.Anyone who says its a minor improvement graphically from 1 is nuts.It a huge improvement considering the lighting is the best i have seen yet.I think will set the bar for another year or two easy.

couple the fact that the world looks huge the lighting is amazing the graphics are best yet and the amount of enemy on screen is insane with no frame hiccups.

every dev needs to hire cliffy b for every job he is a true artist.

 I think you are exaggerating. It looks nice, but there is better. The amazing this is how large the area is. 



starcraft on 10 May 2008
sc94597 said:
starcraft said:
I'm guessing 30fps. I doubt either high-def console can run that kind of stuff at 60fps, least of all at 1080p.

It's going to be 1080p?

No, I doubt either this, R2 or K2 will be higher than 720p.

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Bodhesatva on 10 May 2008

They're debating the FPS on several other forums, and the general consensus seems to be that the FPS is significantly over 30. No one wants to say 60, just because that seems to be the unattainable goal of so many games, but 31+ consistent seemed to be the opinion of everyone who watched this on TV.



http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">

Around the Network
sc94597 on 10 May 2008
Bodhesatva said:
They're debating the FPS on several other forums, and the general consensus seems to be that the FPS is significantly over 30. No one wants to say 60, just because that seems to be the unattainable goal of so many games, but 31+ consistent seemed to be the opinion of everyone who watched this on TV.

 I don't think console games run at anything other than 30fps or 60fps IIRC.



Bodhesatva on 10 May 2008
sc94597 said:
Bodhesatva said:
They're debating the FPS on several other forums, and the general consensus seems to be that the FPS is significantly over 30. No one wants to say 60, just because that seems to be the unattainable goal of so many games, but 31+ consistent seemed to be the opinion of everyone who watched this on TV.

I don't think console games run at anything other than 30fps or 60fps IIRC.


 With consistency, correct. It can, however, have a theoretical limit of 60, but constantly dip below. 



http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">

FilaBrasileiro on 10 May 2008
sc94597 said:
dolemit3 said:

Looks really really good:

tons of locusts at once

locust shields

brumaks

more inside:

http://gamevideos.com/video/id/18698

Fixed. The graphics are no doubt the best so far this gen on consoles, but I could see something passing it up a few months after it's released. I'm truly amazed at how much bigger the world got, and how many characters/enemies are onscreen. Can't wait until it's out.

 

I'll have to disagree with you on that, the graphics look the same as Gears 1 which are the 3rd best graphics of any console games out right now. Gears 2 will be amazing though, can't wait.

 



sc94597 on 10 May 2008
FilaBrasileiro said:
sc94597 said:
dolemit3 said:

Looks really really good:

tons of locusts at once

locust shields

brumaks

more inside:

http://gamevideos.com/video/id/18698

Fixed. The graphics are no doubt the best so far this gen on consoles, but I could see something passing it up a few months after it's released. I'm truly amazed at how much bigger the world got, and how many characters/enemies are onscreen. Can't wait until it's out.

 

I'll have to disagree with you on that, the graphics look the same as Gears 1 which are the 3rd best graphics of any console games out right now. Gears 2 will be amazing though, can't wait.

 


 They don't look the same. The difference in the lighting, and textures is enough to make it #1 for now. The game is still not done yet btw. 



UltimateFighter on 10 May 2008
sc94597 said:
UltimateFighter said:
That was amazing it really was.This game aint even done and it looked 150%.Graphically it look like something a console shouldn't be able to do this gen.I cant believe how good it looks.Anyone who says its a minor improvement graphically from 1 is nuts.It a huge improvement considering the lighting is the best i have seen yet.I think will set the bar for another year or two easy.

couple the fact that the world looks huge the lighting is amazing the graphics are best yet and the amount of enemy on screen is insane with no frame hiccups.

every dev needs to hire cliffy b for every job he is a true artist.

I think you are exaggerating. It looks nice, but there is better. The amazing this is how large the area is.


 Name something on a console that looks better than that.There is nothing period and the fact like you said is that its in a huge area that this is going on.I dont understand how on a console that is supposibly dead this is possible.