By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Bioshock Coming To PS3 This September?

roadkillers on 26 April 2008

I hope it does. It would be dumb for them not to. Seriously one of the best games ever and they are having money troubles. The ydid that For Elder Scrolls 4 where they said it will not come to the PS3 and it did. Hope it does.



fgsduilfgasuklwgefidslzfgb4yiogwefhawi4fbielat5gy240bh3e

Around the Network
starcraft on 26 April 2008
SpartanFX said:
starcraft said:
SpartanFX said:
 

Tell me about it ,,,Let me tell you that I am a gamer and loved some of the games on 360(played them)but after watching Starcraft's behaviour and his haterd towards PS3 for no reason,unintentionally I started to lose my intrest in 360,

Great. So you'll respond to their random attacks, but not to my legitimate logic.

 

And about the split screen thing,,,He ask is there Split screen offered on PS3 ,,and you chose to answer:

"There is no splitscreen. The PS3 version has pop-in and framerate issues as is. You really think it could handle rendering two parts of Liberty City at once?"



Whats wrong with that? I didn't mention the 360 at all?  Everyone else in the thread thought it reasonable, some actually defended me against you.

starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Rock_on_2008 on 26 April 2008

Bioshock was an over rated game. I found it really really boring. Bioshock was a very easy game even on hard with unlimited continues and the enemy damage was flawed.
Resistance 2, Kill Zone 2, MGS 4, GTA IV, Haze, Socom:Confrontation out this year on the PS3 all look better and are more fun games than Bioshock

BTW: Bioshock had no online multi-player. I say it again Bioshock had no online multi-player.



roadkillers on 26 April 2008
Rock_on_2008 said:
Bioshock was an over rated game. I found it really really boring. Bioshock was a very easy game even on hard with unlimited continues and the enemy damage was flawed.
Resistance 2, Kill Zone 2, MGS 4, GTA IV, Haze, Socom:Confrontation out this year on the PS3 all look better and are more fun games than Bioshock

BTW: Bioshock had no online multi-player. I say it again Bioshock had no online multi-player.


I dont care about online as long as its good. I think the release date is dumb as hell though. There gunna be putting a port up against Killzone, Resistence, and littlebigplanet.



fgsduilfgasuklwgefidslzfgb4yiogwefhawi4fbielat5gy240bh3e

Million on 26 April 2008
starcraft said:
Million said:
 

1.Basing Bioshocks 1 exclusivity on an article that doesn't have abosoloutue credibility , Illogical.

2.Basing your sales estimate on Bioshock 2 with your belief that it Bio won't come out on the PS3 , Illogical.

3.Constantly saing the 360 has the "Complete" version of GTA IV when DLC is add on content , Illogical.

4.Constant bashing and undermining of the PS3 , Illogical.

 

Should I go on ? , I'm sure your post history should show just how much of a fanboy you really are.

1. I didn't. I am talking about an entirely seperate and well known quote from (I think) Ken Levine.

Regardless ,you can't be exactly sure of the terms of the exclusivity , don't say it like it's gospel.

2. Given the former, and given I qualified it as such, it is perfectly legitimate to assume the second game won't do well (see my reply to DMeisterJ).

Honeslt I can't be bothered to , if Bioshock 2 is released on the PS3 even without Bioshock 1 I seriously dought it'll hinder it's sales performance , As a standalone game it's story should make sense to people who haven't played Bioshock 1. And regardless of story line it'll still sell well , gamers generaly have put the main emphasis on the gameplay.

3. I don't say that, I say the 360 version has the "complete experience" as a direct quote from the Rockstar representative found here:

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/07/26/rockstar-only-gta-iv-on-xbox-has-complete-experience/

So the XBOX 360 has 100% of GTA IV , what are PS3 owners playing 60-70 % ? Please...

Quoted from Joystick

"But I guess if you want the complete experience with the episodes, then yeah, you should buy the 360, I suppose."

If you ask me it sounds like some one paid him to say that . But it couldn't possibly be MS they wouldn't ever do anything like that would they?

4. Doesn't happen, nice try though.

I won't even bother addressing this point , Your reputation justifies it and it's a well deserved reputation.

 


 




Around the Network
TheRealMafoo on 26 April 2008
TheRealMafoo said:
starcraft said:
TheRealMafoo said:
starcraft said:

You can't possibly play RPG's of any description, or you'd love your 360, and hate the PS3.


You said it right here.


Oh. And do you want to include the context, or continue to misrepresent what I'm saying?

 lol, so now you think I am taking that out of context? You implied that if he was a gamer, the 360 lineup is so much stronger, that he should hate the PS3. That's the exact context I put it in. I noticed you didn't offer up any other kind of context. You just make a blanket statement and move on.

You have no idea how to admit you have lost an argument do you? God your a piece of work Starcraft :) 


 I see you decided not to continue. I backed you into a corner and you had no where to go, so you left. Understood. Thanks for the conversion. :)



Gazz on 26 April 2008

Bioshock was the reason I got a 360 back in the day. Those 360's whom both rrod'ed are the main reason I don't have great sympathy towards the 360 anymore, but I liked the original xbox. Selling the 360 however provided me with a new GPU for my pc which allowed me to play Bioshock with greater graphics and my pc never failed on me during gameplay.

And now I MIGHT also get to play the dlc on my PS3, nice.



PSN name: Gazz1979 (feel free to add me, but please put your Vgchartz name in the message!)

Battlefield 2: Gazz1979

 

starcraft on 26 April 2008
Million said:
starcraft said:
Million said:
 

1.Basing Bioshocks 1 exclusivity on an article that doesn't have abosoloutue credibility , Illogical.

2.Basing your sales estimate on Bioshock 2 with your belief that it Bio won't come out on the PS3 , Illogical.

3.Constantly saing the 360 has the "Complete" version of GTA IV when DLC is add on content , Illogical.

4.Constant bashing and undermining of the PS3 , Illogical.

 

Should I go on ? , I'm sure your post history should show just how much of a fanboy you really are.

1. I didn't. I am talking about an entirely seperate and well known quote from (I think) Ken Levine.

Regardless ,you can't be exactly sure of the terms of the exclusivity , don't say it like it's gospel.

What should we consider gospel if not the word of the game director? 

2. Given the former, and given I qualified it as such, it is perfectly legitimate to assume the second game won't do well (see my reply to DMeisterJ).

Honeslt I can't be bothered to , if Bioshock 2 is released on the PS3 even without Bioshock 1 I seriously dought it'll hinder it's sales performance , As a standalone game it's story should make sense to people who haven't played Bioshock 1. And regardless of story line it'll still sell well , gamers generaly have put the main emphasis on the gameplay. 

This our opinion either way, but my reasoning is just as justified as yours.

3. I don't say that, I say the 360 version has the "complete experience" as a direct quote from the Rockstar representative found here:

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/07/26/rockstar-only-gta-iv-on-xbox-has-complete-experience/

So the XBOX 360 has 100% of GTA IV , what are PS3 owners playing 60-70 % ? Please...

Quoted from Joystick

"But I guess if you want the complete experience with the episodes, then yeah, you should buy the 360, I suppose."

If you ask me it sounds like some one paid him to say that . But it couldn't possibly be MS they wouldn't ever do anything like that would they?

He was paid to say that?  Come on, now your stretching. I said nothing about 60-70%.

 


 


 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

starcraft on 26 April 2008
TheRealMafoo said:
TheRealMafoo said:
starcraft said:
TheRealMafoo said:
starcraft said:

You can't possibly play RPG's of any description, or you'd love your 360, and hate the PS3.


You said it right here.


Oh. And do you want to include the context, or continue to misrepresent what I'm saying?

lol, so now you think I am taking that out of context? You implied that if he was a gamer, the 360 lineup is so much stronger, that he should hate the PS3. That's the exact context I put it in. I noticed you didn't offer up any other kind of context. You just make a blanket statement and move on.

You have no idea how to admit you have lost an argument do you? God your a piece of work Starcraft :)


I see you decided not to continue. I backed you into a corner and you had no where to go, so you left. Understood. Thanks for the conversion. :)


 My opinion IS that the RPG LIBRARY is far greater than the PS3's.  Note that I said library not line-up.  The only exclusive RPG I can think of that the PS3 has is Folklore, and people keep telling me it's action adventure not an RPG.

So based on it's library, if all you wanted to play was RPG's, would you like the PS3?

(oh, and I know you'd just love it if I dropped out of an argument   Alas, I just went for a shower, gotta smell nice for the Mrs.) 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

selnor on 26 April 2008

VGchartz is becoming a real tedious place to be. There is so much arguing from people about what console is best that everyone here is basically not interested in playing games and talking about them. Everyone STOP saying a particular console is better. Do you think the PS2 was the most powerful and best console. It was the games that made the system. Even in the games department, People get real funny if you talk bad about there favourite consoles exclusives. Who gives a toss. Just play your games.