thetonestarr said: Nintendo is partially as great a developer as they are for the same reason that EA is - they own good developers (although, I'd have to say Nintendo probably owns much better ones).
People need to remember that.
Now, what has been stated in this thread is truth - Nintendo already has the status as "the Disney of videogames". They most definitely did have a very huge part in bringing videogaming to the level it's at today. The third generation of videogaming was started by the NES, which was released in Japan while the Crash of 1983 was taking place. The NES sold 60 million consoles, while its nearest competition - the Master System - sold 13 million. A very, very poor "competition", to say the least.
Assuredly, if it were not for the NES, gaming would be nothing like it is today. Thanks to the NES, we saw videogaming become a "mainstream hobby", and I can guarantee that the Turbografx16 and the Genesis wouldn't have existed if the NES hadn't. Without the NES, NEC likely wouldn't have seen gaming as a significant enough investment of their time and money. SEGA wouldn't have seen as much need to upgrade their Master System into the Mega Drive (or, quite possibly, they may have not even MADE the Master System), and even if they DID, the market just wouldn't have been quite as significant.
|
I don't know if anyone has told you but during the NES era, Nintendo was like the freaking mafia of the gaming world. They made or broke entire retail chains with their product shipments. When Nintendo cracked its whip, everyone answered or paid the price.
Nintendo was not the fun, family-friendly company you think of it as today. It was fearsome, evil, and powerful.
Nintendo didn't win entirely on its own merit, it won partially because its bullying and brutally aggressive tactics make the competition wet themselves.