By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - 32k screenshot - Files now work for non 32k ready computers

 

Do you like photo modes?

Yes 8 33.33%
 
No 6 25.00%
 
Never tried one 8 33.33%
 
Nintendo is getting on board, so soon 2 8.33%
 
Total:24
vivster on 01 October 2017
caffeinade said:
vivster said:

My mouse and a double click. Microsoft was generous enough to provide me with a default image viewer.

Ew, I take back what I said.

Default software from Microsoft is the Worst.
Honestly who makes Office then has a team to make WordPad.
Do they go to the other team, show them what the good staff members did, and say "make this, but worse".

Use GIMP to view the image, it will actually load the image before showing you a blurry approximation of it.

Why use some ballast 3rd party app when it works just fine with the windows image viewer. Takes less than half a second for the image to clear up when I zoom in.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Around the Network
caffeinade on 01 October 2017
vivster said:
caffeinade said:

Ew, I take back what I said.

Default software from Microsoft is the Worst.
Honestly who makes Office then has a team to make WordPad.
Do they go to the other team, show them what the good staff members did, and say "make this, but worse".

Use GIMP to view the image, it will actually load the image before showing you a blurry approximation of it.

Why use some ballast 3rd party app when it works just fine with the windows image viewer. Takes less than half a second for the image to clear up when I zoom in.

All you are going to end up seeing is a, tainted image.

Just fine, is not good enough when trying to view perfection (or as close to it as we can get).



vivster on 02 October 2017
caffeinade said:
vivster said:

Why use some ballast 3rd party app when it works just fine with the windows image viewer. Takes less than half a second for the image to clear up when I zoom in.

All you are going to end up seeing is a, tainted image.

Just fine, is not good enough when trying to view perfection (or as close to it as we can get).

The monitors to view perfection haven't been invented yet. That's why I'm still using some shitty 1440p 144Hz monitor.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

caffeinade on 02 October 2017
vivster said:
caffeinade said:

All you are going to end up seeing is a, tainted image.

Just fine, is not good enough when trying to view perfection (or as close to it as we can get).

The monitors to view perfection haven't been invented yet. That's why I'm still using some shitty 1440p 144Hz monitor.

You filthy...



vivster on 02 October 2017
caffeinade said:
vivster said:

The monitors to view perfection haven't been invented yet. That's why I'm still using some shitty 1440p 144Hz monitor.

You filthy...

Call Asus and Nvidia. They're the filthy casuals. Neither of them can produce something that can run games at 8k 165 FPS.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Around the Network
caffeinade on 02 October 2017
vivster said:
caffeinade said:

You filthy...

Call Asus and Nvidia. They're the filthy casuals. Neither of them can produce something that can run games at 8k 165 FPS.

I blame ARM, their GPUs are not powerful enough.