By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Thoughts on Crpytocurrency (BTC, ETH, etc.)

 

Do you own or plan to own cryptocurrency?

I own it. 6 15.38%
 
I don't own it, but I want to. 11 28.21%
 
I don't own it, and I don't want to. 22 56.41%
 
Total:39

I bought and spent some a couple of years ago and still have a few fractions of it lying around somewhere. I think it's a great idea and I hope it and/or another crypto alongside gold and silver put an end to paper money for good.

If some young, entrepreneur here at VGC wants to go set up some sales bets over at betmoose, I'll throw some bitcoins their way.



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!

Around the Network

Damn I wish I bought bitcoins years ago :(



Proud to be a Californian.

It works because our current currencies are free floating (so it's only backed by our trust). But without government backing, these will always be way too volatile to be real useful currencies, and then there is the matter of who controls the currency in question.



WolfpackN64 said:
It works because our current currencies are free floating (so it's only backed by our trust). But without government backing, these will always be way too volatile to be real useful currencies, and then there is the matter of who controls the currency in question.

For stability's sake, it really could use expanded adoption. Let's keep in mind that more people in the US own BTC than the populations of 40% of the states and 60% of sovereign nations. That being said, most of those nations use USD, anyway.



Insidb said:
WolfpackN64 said:
It works because our current currencies are free floating (so it's only backed by our trust). But without government backing, these will always be way too volatile to be real useful currencies, and then there is the matter of who controls the currency in question.

For stability's sake, it really could use expanded adoption. Let's keep in mind that more people in the US own BTC than the populations of 40% of the states and 60% of sovereign nations. That being said, most of those nations use USD, anyway.

Expanded adoption will only mean more people will be dragged down when the BTC bubble bursts. It's insulated against nothing.



Around the Network
WolfpackN64 said:
Insidb said:

For stability's sake, it really could use expanded adoption. Let's keep in mind that more people in the US own BTC than the populations of 40% of the states and 60% of sovereign nations. That being said, most of those nations use USD, anyway.

Expanded adoption will only mean more people will be dragged down when the BTC bubble bursts. It's insulated against nothing.

To quote a scholar and possibe gentleman: even "our current currencies are free floating (so it's only backed by our trust)."



Insidb said:
WolfpackN64 said:

Expanded adoption will only mean more people will be dragged down when the BTC bubble bursts. It's insulated against nothing.

To quote a scholar and possibe gentleman: even "our current currencies are free floating (so it's only backed by our trust)."

Correct, but there is a difference between government backing and nothing backing.



WolfpackN64 said:
Insidb said:

To quote a scholar and possibe gentleman: even "our current currencies are free floating (so it's only backed by our trust)."

Correct, but there is a difference between government backing and nothing backing.

I agree, which is why I think the currencies need a large pool of risk diffusion.



0815user said:
it's dotcom en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble 2.0. cryptocurrencys might become important sometime in the future but in their current state they are mainly good for speculation, money laundring and other illegal activities. wouldn't even be surprised if terrorism is linked to bitcoin somehow. therefore not supporting it.

It's very different from the dotcom bubble, in scale, in the participants, and in the objective.

 

Dotcom bubble was much larger, thanks to the participation of actual investors, simply overvaluing actual, existing companies, which then crashed after failing to produce much of value.

 

Bitcoin was, from the get-go, a disruptive movement with the goal of overthrowing the current currencies. It was poorly planned (no mecanism to control inflation for example, which could be dangerous), and makes it unviable as a currency form, which is why I believe it to likely fail in the near future, WITHOUT any repercussions on the financial markets (as nothing is lost - simply a transfer of value from bitcoins to usd, or whatever)

 

Tesla might pull a mini Dotcom bubble.



Bet with PeH: 

I win if Arms sells over 700 000 units worldwide by the end of 2017.

Bet with WagnerPaiva:

 

I win if Emmanuel Macron wins the french presidential election May 7th 2017.

I'm thinking about to buy a rx 480 to mine until I got it for "free". so for a free upgrade.. but don't know what to do after that. only problem is that every 480 / 580 is sold out.