0815user said: it's dotcom en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble 2.0. cryptocurrencys might become important sometime in the future but in their current state they are mainly good for speculation, money laundring and other illegal activities. wouldn't even be surprised if terrorism is linked to bitcoin somehow. therefore not supporting it. |
It's very different from the dotcom bubble, in scale, in the participants, and in the objective.
Dotcom bubble was much larger, thanks to the participation of actual investors, simply overvaluing actual, existing companies, which then crashed after failing to produce much of value.
Bitcoin was, from the get-go, a disruptive movement with the goal of overthrowing the current currencies. It was poorly planned (no mecanism to control inflation for example, which could be dangerous), and makes it unviable as a currency form, which is why I believe it to likely fail in the near future, WITHOUT any repercussions on the financial markets (as nothing is lost - simply a transfer of value from bitcoins to usd, or whatever)
Tesla might pull a mini Dotcom bubble.