VGPolyglot said:
Unjust authority is one where a person has control over someone else for personal benefit.
As for your last system, yes there's a conflict because anarchism is anti-capitalist. That's a core part of anarchism. The only way that it isn't is by changing its definition, and if we did that what's the point of having terms in the first place if they can just be changed at will?
|
Your values =/= Righteousness for the world ...
There is no changing the definition since business owners are NOT government but you refuse to accept that to the bitter end ...
Businesses have no control over an individual's sovereignty. The world doesn't care about your idea of right or wrong or anyone elses ...
Capitalism doesn't need to be forgone in anarchism, in fact if it were forgone it would stop being pure anarchism because a rule was installed in which no private business owners can exist but it also paradoxically implodes the idea of "absence of rule" ...
In other words, capitalism doesn't threaten the idea of anarchism, it's socialsm and communism that threatens anarchism because they are somehow justified oxymoronically to install a statewide "rule" ...