By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - The right has its own version of political correctness. It’s just as stifling.

Mr Puggsly said:
VGPolyglot said:

Why? Why is it so bad to be opposed a society with no oppression and exploitation?

If communist countries weren't historically so shitty I might see your point.

Tell me, which communist counry would you like to live in right now?

The way it is going now he maybe can choose Belgium the communist party is growing rapdily... 

So far they aren't doing that bad the first day in parlement they cut their montly salary of 6.000 euro to 1800 euro because they believe a politician should live like the average joe to also feel the tax increases etc.

Still not a fan of them tho =p.






Around the Network
VGPolyglot said:

Unjust authority is one where a person has control over someone else for personal benefit. 

As for your last system, yes there's a conflict because anarchism is anti-capitalist. That's a core part of anarchism. The only way that it isn't is by changing its definition, and if we did that what's the point of having terms in the first place if they can just be changed at will?

Your values =/= Righteousness for the world ... 

There is no changing the definition since business owners are NOT government but you refuse to accept that to the bitter end ... 

Businesses have no control over an individual's sovereignty. The world doesn't care about your idea of right or wrong or anyone elses ... 

Capitalism doesn't need to be forgone in anarchism, in fact if it were forgone it would stop being pure anarchism because a rule was installed in which no private business owners can exist but it also paradoxically implodes the idea of "absence of rule" ... 

In other words, capitalism doesn't threaten the idea of anarchism, it's socialsm and communism that threatens anarchism because they are somehow justified oxymoronically to install a statewide "rule" ...