The Wii had 40+ exclusives that all went over 1m?

Yes. 42 on my last count. I think it was 66 total titles that went over one million.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_Wii_video_games

They have all their sources listed at the bottom. It would take an eternity to read through them all, however. Plus, look at the list, I do not think anyone would argue anything on that list selling more than a million. And I did say by my count... which means, it could be more, even.

And lastly, I could have counted Pro Evolution Soccer 2008 but I decided that even though it is drastically different than the other games before it or on its contemporaries, it was still a Pro Evolution title and thus, I omitted it from my count.

Wikipedia? Why don't you count the exclusives from this list http://www.vgchartz.com/platform/2/wii/ ?

I never claimed it as gospal. I said my count and I did not say it was official. However, I doubt very highly any of the titles on that list sold less than a million except the last two (maybe... because it says shipped not sold), but with 92 sources on 66 titles and this site having almost every single title as a million seller plus as a cross reference (which I also do not use on its own as gospal), I think it is safe to use it as a measure. Even if you think some of them did not sell a million, how many do you legitimately think you could argue? 30? That sounds ludicrious.

Again, by my count. I did not claim it to be official, but I think it is safe enough to use it as a source when someone asks for my source to back my count.

So if you count R&C (remake) and LBP3 (PS3+PS4), you must count TLoU as well. Isn't it? Or remove R&C.
Possibly MLB The Show 15 and 16 both are over 1M retail+digital.

I have 6 from that list ^^
Very nice all of em, cept for Bloodborne... Im bad at it, so hard. I would need to put much time on it, and I dont have it, so I have to go with easier games instead :( Not a hardcore gamer anymore.

Because I do not trust a site alone without some sources. And Wikipedia (while minimizing my point) does have references for their sales data which makes it more reliable, in my opinion.