GTA 4?  That's the game in lower resolution on the PS3, right?  It's HD on the 360, but not HD on the PS3.

CoD 4 looks very similar on both systems.  I didn't notice much of a difference myself, except that they both looked like shit compared to the PC version.  I don't know about Burnout, but if you look at Madden 08 it's very obvious that the 360 version looks and plays better.  Same with

I'm not a dev, not for high end games anyhow, but I do understand the architecture of the Cell (I developed a pipelined processor while earning my computer science degree) and I understand game engines (developed one of those, too).  You can find plenty of devs who will say, "the PS3 is more powerful" or "the 360 is more powerful."   The only real area of contention is the Cell and Xenon, as its accepted (and simply a fact) that the 360 has more fill rate and they have about the same amount of memory (small advantage to the 360 here).

And Cell vs Xenon is not a simple discussion because they cannot be directly compared.  The ultimate answer is that the Cell is very fast for some things, but not others, whereas the Xenon is quite fast for most things.  Again, compared to modern processors they're both fairly slow, but not nearly as slow as the GPUs in each of those systems. 

They're both video game toys, sure.  Neither is a super powerful system -- we're already 3 years into the "Next generation" of games, and already PCs can mop the floor with either of the systems handily and they're struggling to live up to the promise of HD gaming.  But, whatever, take offense that I suggested the 360 toy is about equivalent with the PS3 toy, except for some minor differences. 

I did not push any ps3 agenda.. for u info i love my 360 and i owned every microsoft gaming system and zune. The guy said the 360 is stronger and thats just not true.

You said devs should go to 360 for money... and since wii has sold 10 million more then 360 thats also not true.

"Er?

No Mac has ever used anything resembling a Cell processor."

Cell processors all use power pc architect.

"Er?

No Mac has ever used anything resembling a Cell processor." 

Cell processors all use power pc architect. 

 "EPIC fail.

burnout, GTA4, COD4 to name a few.

uncharted looks better then anygame on 360 and killzone kills halo3 is graphics. GT5 KILLs forza in every way possible and has more shit in it.

and are u a dev? because real devs say all the time that the ps3 is stronger...this is a fact... i hate when people argue the facts. In fact a couple of devs said that 360 is maxed out whereas ps3 is not.

I dont feel like finding a link but i will if u want me to.. i am at work...."

Are you talking about his statement or yours?

So far ever multi platform game runs faster and sometimes beter looking(but never worse) on a 360.  Maybe its because it harder to write code for 7 cpu's or maybe its because the 360 runs at 240 gFlops instead of 214 which the ps3 runs at.  Either way ps3 sucks.

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/07/02/1up-360-football-games-to-run-faster-than-ps3/ 

"360 can't handle MGS4 just like PS2 couldn't handle Ninja Gaiden."

360 is still the most powerfull platform on the market

"GTAV...well R* didn't take advantage of blu-ray because of the deal with MS so it's possible that the next GTA might be PS3 exclusive (hey, you said best Technology. Larger storage, HDDs in all units)"

 There is no true advantage of blu-ray.....First off blu ray runs slower than a DVD, second if you really need the extra space do what lost oddessy did.  Best technology laarger storage?  Have you heard of the game called 96K, its a game that 96 killobites and looks like halo 2 graphics and runs into 10 mins of game play.  No need to have large storage when you got Procedural generation .

I may trash ps3 a lot but I own one, months before I got my 360 i was a big fan of sony but since the ps3 is such a screw up why should i support them. 

I said that it makes sense for developers to go 360/PS3 for money... And the list of games I provided is indisputable that there is a lot of success to be had there.  The Wii is an entirely different animal and some games would require massive reworking just to get them running on the console, not to mention that sacrifices would need to be made to graphics and gameplay to conform to the Wii's vastly different setup.

"Yes, but so does the 360. The Xenon is much closer to a G5 than the Cell."

True not gonna argue. I just ment the cell is designed off and only for the power architecture processors.