No, I am not. Why would I be worried. I am not even lurking. How can I be lurking if I am busy. 

I already said that couple of times and will try to post everyday.  

That's why I placed a disclaimer that it was from a long time ago. 

Also, don't put words in my mouth. I never said that lurkers are not a problem. I already had a discussion with Links about this but I am not a really fond of lynching lurkers day 1 and I would rather have a no lynch. 

This is how I play it zero, because I have the same concerns about some of you guys as well. I find some players very hard to read, and yes, things like linkz not being dead or targeted floats through my head every now and again.

The trick is to actually look at real evidence. Who is trying to contribute, who is not. If you have trouble reading someone, look at everyone else first. Find the easy reads. Build you base of trustworthy players and start eliminating suspects slowly.

Hopefully, the person you can't read will be power roled, or hopefully someone else will see something. Like for instance linkz is always kind of on my mind, and I'm always second gessing myself over his play. I didn't like how he called out a possible bluff earlier, but I also like that he reread a previous game to try and catch a read. I also like how he called miz out when we had 4 possible lynches on the board. See, a mafia would try and steer toward one of the possibilities. Mafia doesn't generally go out on a limb to say stuff. That's why the lynch lurkers rule works, because scum don't like to make enemies. So to me, linkz calling out miz seemingly out of the blue, when we had available suspects was a very nice town behavior.

I guess what I'm saying is, don't try and tunnel on one player because you'll be missing everything else happening around you. I've been wrong enough times to know that.

1st. You are focusing too much on the word "lurkers" 

2nd I know that day has ended already. 

3rd I never said that lurkers are not a problem. Hence you put words into my mouth. I had a convo with links and I agree to it but not lynching them day 1.

4th: SInce you point that out. Spurge loves to point out easy lynches. Will notice something to lynch somebody.  A pattern that I saw when he was playing as scum. I noticed that when I was hosting a game. Again that was from a long time ago. I don't know how he plays now.

I also placed a snippet on my first post. 

Funny though as soon as I place you on my scum list I instantly listed on your scum list. What happen to Prof I though you suspect him?

If by "easy" you mean "clearly optimal for town", then yes. 

But actually I suspect you're thinking of times that I had two or three relatively equal suspects, so it only makes sense to push for the one town seems most likely to lynch.  Or, you know, lynching a damned dirty lurker. 

Hey.  Listen you. 

If you did all this just to get reactions out of people and scum hunt that way, well done.  "Clever girl."  Now unvote yourself already. 

If you were just feeling sad and frustrated, learn to play better, by which I mean don't act against the best interests of town, and no it's not in town's best interest to lynch a 100% town player, which from your perspective you allegedly are.  So unvote yourself already. 

And BTW Scenario 1 is a damned dangerous game that I wouldn't recommend. You were repeatedly at L-1, after all. But it's at least a better motivation than Scenario 2.

Final-Fan, I love you.

Votals

Translation: He's gonna be gone either way. Might as well get me some townie points...

And TFW Mr.P's latest few posts are totally bussing Stefl too, lol.

If I had to guess another scummate, it would be Clyde. It's subtle, but this guy's overall tone is just so anti-town: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8179094

And since I'm tired of this Day, and linkz (who I also trust) is also voting him:

Vote: Clyde32