Here. 

What if Clyde successfully drew maf attention, but also drew doc attention? In other words, what if prof made up his story?

The question now is whether or not a doc would be able to read that. 

Not out of possibility, I've done the gambit in another game and it worked.

not sure if my post ninjaed you yesterday, still wanted to repeat myself in this and I believe if I actually voted we would've gotten that hammer right now.

gonna address the parts that were dropped (apart from the one with darwin, which I already explained in an interaction with linkz)

to gonna continue where I skipped, Clyde does feel the best target objectively, as in, his "slip" if we want to call it that was the most scumlike thing said today. The thing is weather or not that actually means he is scum. I do not think he was blatantly disruptive like mr.p, which is the most of the reason I want to see mr.p gone. As I said, I think I am willing to join his lynch, but I am not fully convinced he has to be scum yet, this may seem like backpaddling or so - but to counteract that - he is appeared scummy enough to me to warrant a lynch.

In regards to noctis, he never actually commited to saying he is actually pro day 1 lynch or counter day 1 lynch overall - but he didn't make it appear as if he were reluctant to lynch earlier (unless it would lynch all lurkers vs no lynch). In his no lynch vote post he claimed that Mr.P was getting lynched for being a lurker (or more precisely - the lynch train started because he was a lurker), when several people already argued that if we were to go for a lurker lynch clyde or noctis would be more efficient targets than mr.p. Mr.P was hardly lurking at that point anymore. Anyway, his post after I voted him was enough to make me unvote him, what he states is true to a certain extent, but even a lurker lynch is never a free cruise like he claims it to be. Looking back at it now it makes me really uncomfy how he keeps reassuring that he will post again and again. To me he is the weakest out of my 4 scumspects, but the most likely to be affiliated with mr.p. Oh, and yeah, to the point why I think he could gain traction? Because I think he has contributed little enough to fall under the lynch all lurkers category and actually has also something going against him other than that, though, to repeat, I think what that is, is comparatively weak.

On this prospect I could discuss clyde again, who also was a tie-creator, even more so than noctis - I do not think clyde would tie a towny at this point, unless scum has a way to speed up the game, yet I also do not believe he would tie a scum unless he is really powerful. That is if clyde were to be scum. This is the main reason why I am not sold on clyde yet and why I am reluctant to join his lynch just like that.

Anyway, ranking them I'd say that mr.p is still the worthiest to be lynched, because I think even if he would be a townie, at least him being a distraction would be gone, because I think a lot of focus would just be lost on him again tomorrow if we don't lynch him. After that I would go for clyde, then darwin, then noctis.

That is weak reasoning, even for you...

(In other news: I think it is time to get my arse out of the past and actually contibute to current events again, since I kinda feel out of the loop already, don't worry, I will still finish that documentary on FF)

Yo, btw, what do you think of my recent posts, did I miss something important when exploring FF, noctis, mr.p, clyde and darwin?

Okay, I was fairly okay with spurge appearing that scummy to me, but you are reaching mr. p levels on my scale slowly but surely if you will keep on like this. I know you might be fucking trolling with your second scum found, but really... your reasoning has to be beyond I am voting for scum and I get distrust for it, so the person distrusting me must be scum too. Heck, even right now I should move really down there to scum-tier just going by that logic.

Yeah, that's true.

On the other hand, even if Mr.P is maf, he could still be BP. That particular scenario doesn't prove anything about prof, nor vice-versa. Prof could be lying, and Mr.P telling the truth. Frustrating af, lol.

I just noticed, though: Mr.P hasn't posted since around the time he voted for himself. I think he (as maf) made a mistake in claiming BP, realized it, and gave up. Does that fit his meta, @anyone reading this?

Also, I think just about ready to end the Day anyways. Hopefully Tomorrow will bring new info.

I don't think that's likely. If Clyde is town, his hint would give mafia doc fear. Which means they'd either strongman the kill or lean towards a "free" kill somewhere else. They might also have a roleblocker to stop Clyde rather than killing.

Similarly, a mafia Clyde could have tried to draw doc protection to more easily take out an intended target.