Well anyways, I read through their posts and couldn't find enough to put him at the top of my list.

Can you point out some of your favorite posts of his, so to speak?

Yes, I am asking you if you think he is scum? Its very simple. You can actually answer with a yes or no. 

You also said you suspects us because we are lurking. He had 2 votes and now 3 and yet you don't  vote for him? You can just unvote MrP and vote Clyde because you think he is scum. Again what's stopping you? 

I don't mind you voting for me. It's kinda funny that when I asked you question you quickly suspect me again? 

Why the vote for Mr. P and sticking your vote until now? Do you think he is scum or voting for the sake of voting? 

Now:

Whats your opinon 

With Clyde, Darwin and Mr P? Instead of attacking me why not answer my question?

I feel like his behavior in the situation darwin put the town into was a pretty good simulation of being a good townie. 
But I feel only a little worse. 

Q: Do I think he's scum? A: I'm not sure.

Why should the number of votes have any effect on my opinion? I still suspect you more.

There is no "again". I never stopped suspecting you.

The reason I stuck with my vote on Mr.P is because I had no real reason to change it. Yes, I want to lynch you more, but the BW just wasn't happening.

My opinion:
- Clyde: I see an attempt to participate, but I also see some apparent inconsistencies.
- Darwin: he seems towny, but that's just my opinion.
- Mr.P: he seems scummy, although it's been so long since I formed this opinon, I can't really remember why without reading back.

Okay, there. That's my opinion on the people you asked for. Now gimme your opinion on: Clyde, Darwin, Mr.P, linkz, prof, final-fan, Stefl, axum, and myself.

miz, I'm working on your request.
In the meantime, why didn't you join Stefl on Noctis early toDay?

It's combination of two things. Firstly, and this may sound weird but: I didn't buy his reasoning for voting Noctis. I mean, I still had my reasons, but I wasn't buying his. Second was: I guess I wasn't paying much attention to his post to begin with. No offense, Stefl :p

Now that I think about the first bit though, I guess I should have joined in, since what difference did it make, as long as I got what I wanted? It's like scumhunting, but refusing a helping vote from scum; it sorta feels wrong, but what difference does it make as long as you get your lynch? Also, the events that followed were kinda distracting, and I am easily distracted.

Sorry this took so long. Starting with the first post I would deem as content.(Ignoring tags and jokes)

Non-Content is trivial stuff that could have been omitted completely without any loss. In Clyde's defense a couple of posts were replies to Non-Content or mere explanations of roles that someone would have had to do. However, I also leaned more heavily towards counting his posts as content/scumhunting than I normally would as well.

Content is posts that someone can be held accountable for. Thoughts or opinions that someone can point out later and question the reasoning. Things that can be compared to similar or different stances over time and why there's a change or lack thereof.

^ signifies unprompted scum-hunting. Either giving an opinion on someone without being asked or asking for opinions from others.

* signifies prompted scum-hunting. Responding to questions or following up on ^ or * posts.

So that's 3+12 posts for Clyde out of 33 Content and 48 total.
Meanwhile it's 3+11 posts for Noctis out of 23 Content and 24 total.

We must have wildy different opinions of scumhunting and filler posts, because

Shouts Clyde to me moreso than Noctis.

@Your recent reply:
You didn't buy Stefl's reasoning at the time or you don't buy it looking at it now?

I supect Darwin. Hence the vote. Clearly a blatant of not answering questions. 
I have thank Links for this. I asked how many mafias are there and still not answering that quetion.

Its either he is ignoring it or not reading the thread at all. I am making sure that I quote him so it will be blue. Prof started the question, Linkz quetioned him again. I took the liberty of asking him again and yet Darwin is avoiding those questions. Then posting about newb stuff he is in. 

Cyde I don't have a read on him yet. I am on the middle but leaning town. 

Mr. P an arrogant Townie. 

Linkz out of all the vets I am leaning town.

Prof on the middle. I still don't but his claim. Leaning scum but not good enough to cast a vote.

Stefl. Sorry I am not sure. 

Final-Fan I still think he is scum. 

Axum leaning scum

Zero/spurge I think he is scum. I will explain later. I am still rereadin his post.

Leaning town before but turning into a scum.

I just need to respond to this. How is asking for opinion is just activity for the sake of activity?

I want to know whats your opinion on the people on the Votals? So it's wrong now to ask you? 

I want to know your stance? I can't just blindly asked Darwin with his avoidance.

I'd be quite interested in this when you get the time.

NOTE FOR EVERYONE: This means no hammers toDay before Noctis has the time.