Although, your thoughts on the vote activity would be nice.
miz1q2w3e said:
Banwagoning if I ever saw it. Not much in the way of actual argument or justification on either one's part. |
but bandwagoning in what way? Basically, we had mrp at l-2.
Then we had myself, linkz, and funfan on clyde, and then straight away 2 votes for darwin to tie up darwin with clyde.
I wouldn't call 2nd and 3rd votes bandwagon votes, but I do agree they lack substance if that's what you meant
Darwinianevolution said: Okay, I know I have to choose someone to vote, but now I'm in a bit of a pickle. Prof was my main suspect because of reasons I already wrote a lot of posts ago, but if what he says about being the victim of an attempted murder is true, that changes my opinion on him (for now). Mr. P is not guilty, but he seems to be trying to be killed, and I don't know what is he expecting to achieve. Spurge/Zero is a bit of a mystery due to Spurge abandoning the game, though, to be fair, he did it with some major cause. I'm reading Clyde posts now to try and see if he is suspicious or not, because he just voted me. |
Why would you need to go back and read all of my posts? Prof clearly layed them all out there with his thoughts on it. You make it sound as though you didn't even read Prof's analysis.
miz1q2w3e said:
He quoted me asking some obvious filler, and that's when it hit me. |
I am not asking obvious fillers.
Now I am going to ask. What do you think about Clyde specifically?
NoCtiS_NoX said: I am not asking obvious fillers. |
Same thoughts that I have of you, funnily enough. He is simply "there"; seemingly participating, but something seems off.
Now I ask: why do you ask about him specifically? What are you getting at?
To clarify: I get the same vibe, but to a lesser extent.
miz1q2w3e said:
Same thoughts that I have of you, funnily enough. He is simply "there"; seemingly participating, but something seems off. Now I ask: why do you ask about him specifically? What are you getting at? |
I don't know. I think you know where I am getting at. If he is the same case with me why not vote for me or him?
So if you are going to vote would be me or him?
NoCtiS_NoX said:
I don't know. I think you know where I am getting at. If he is the same case with me why not vote for me or him? |
I really don't know what you're getting at. Unless this is your way of telling me that you suspect me?
As for the two of you: I've made it clear, I'd rather vote for you than him. As for why: like I said, I get the "active lurker" vibe more from you than him.
Sorry for the wait. Thanks again for the unvote, miz. Though it doesn't seem like anyone would've hammered in the past few hours anyway.
Stefl1504 said:
*also adds a note questioning Darwin mentioning "he expected another victim" - but I am not sure if going into that too much is smart* |
Again? You just quoted darwin's post when you realized you had the wrong connection between him and Mr.P in your mind. Or is "another" a typo for "an[y] other?"