What does this mean?

well, he brought mr.playstation up several times in order to defend himself, basically trying to divert attention to him

-snip-

theprof00 said:

~stuff about the out~

After I made a defense of Mr.P: "Indeed. From the looks of it it wasn't until he got fed up with everything that he started getting really defensive.
unvote
I'm not sure if I want to risk it. We have 5 minutes. 

Last post before the night: "I'm hoping to be a lot more active in scum-hunting on day 2. Some information should come out during the night."

Ok, so to summarize everything from day 1, he initially thinks a lynch day 1 is unlikely to be useful. He says that if stefl were a third party, it would be one of those exceptions where town gets an even better benefit (not a mafia, but better than a townie, plus info). His comments on MrP are on the fence. MrP might be or might not be scum. He didn't like MrPs response to pressure and HoS' him. He also FoS Baalz with a promise to look up info that he never followed through on. In defense of his lack of contribution, he gives an excuse that he talks without saying much as a personal fault (saying it's not alignment indicative). He follows up by saying that vanillas should contribute a lot while the power roles keep quiet. He later says when he has info, he will give it to us.
In his closing posts, he never once says that he believes MrP is mafia. He also said MrP's stance was clear when mrP said "why not" in reference to being asked about the suspects Axum or Stefl. Yet, in the very post MrP says that, Clyde quotes him and says, "However, I can't tell if this is a scummy play or just a noob mistake. I feel like a scum would have played this off better, but then I'm not sure how experienced he is in the game. It's definitely something worth applying pressure to. " This was actually the first post that Clyde latched on to by MrP. Clyde says he suspected MrP previously, yet he doesn't actually say anything until that "why not" post, which was called out by several people and looked indicative of a possible train lynch type of post.

Now, day 2 rolls along. Linkz says, "put up or shutup time clyde, what info do you have".
To which, clyde responds: "To be quite honest, nothing. That was bait to see if I would be targetted by the mafia. "

What?

Linkz follows up with, and your suspects are???
Clyde says, HoS on MrP still, and I'll FoS darwin too. He basically says he unvoted MrP because of Prof's defense that MrP wasn't the same meta as his usual mafia meta. He says MrP is likely to have learned and changed his gameplay, so an HoS is warranted.
Linkz correctly asks why Prof's defense of the personal meta was enough to unvote yesterday, but not enough today. He also asks what Clyde thinks of Prof and why on the FoS to darwin.
Clyde says: "I usually reserve a FoS to someone I get a vibe from. HoS when I get something a bit more, and a vote for when there's definitely something to be found from that player. 
 

~tldr and stuff~